期刊文献+

伯林与自由民族主义:从观念分析向社会学视野的转换 被引量:12

Isaiah Berlin and Liberal Nationalism: From conceptual analysis to sociological perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文通过讨论以赛亚·伯林的民族主义论述,分析自由民族主义的理论可能与复杂性。作者认为,伯林的自由多元主义与文化民族主义之间具有和解包容的可能,但始终存在着深刻的紧张,因此他未能提出一套清晰的关于“自由民族主义”的规范性学说。伯林思想的内在紧张标志着自由民族主义的实践困境,而仅仅在观念层面上做出分析疏理无法克服这种困境,必须借助具体语境下的社会学分析才有可能在实践中达成自由主义与民族主义的融合。文章在最后勾勒了当代中国在社会转型的条件下民族主义兴起的形态特征,指出了发展自由民族主义论述的必要性与困难所在。 Basing on discussing the theoretical possibility and complexity of “liberal nationalism' by examining Isaiah Berlin's reflection on nationalism,the author argues that there is tension between liberal pluralism and cultural nationalism in Berlin's thought, which is the reason why he failed to articulate a consistent set of normative theory of liberal nationalism. The difficulty that Berlin confronts with cannot be solved merely through the conceptual clarification at the level of political philosophy. The reconciliation between liberalism and nationalism, if possible, can only be achieved in practice, which requires a sociological approach sensitive to specific social and historical context. At the end, the author briefly delineates the features of nationalist discourse raised in the social transformation of contemporary China, and explores its relation to the prospect for liberal nationalism in China.
作者 刘擎
出处 《社会学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第2期162-181,共20页 Sociological Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1李世涛主编.2002,《知识分子立场—民族主义与转型期中国的命运》.长春:时代文艺出版社.
  • 2刘擎.面对多元价值冲突的困境——伯林论题的再考察[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,37(6):38-48. 被引量:15
  • 3内森·嘉德尔斯.1999,《两种民族主义概念—以赛亚·伯林访谈录》.陆建德译.《万象译事》.沈阳:辽宁教育出版社.
  • 4以赛亚·伯林.2003a,《民族主义:往昔的被忽视与今日的威力》.《反潮流:观念史论文集》.冯克利译.南京:译林出版社.
  • 5以赛亚·伯林.2003b,《反启蒙运动》.《反潮流:观念史论文集》.冯克利译.南京:译林出版社.
  • 6以赛亚·伯林.2003c,《关于偏见的笔记》.《自由论》(《自由四论》扩充版).胡传胜译.南京:译林出版社.
  • 7以赛亚·伯林.2004a,《泰戈尔与民族意识》.《现实感》.潘荣荣,林茂译.南京:译林出版社.
  • 8以赛亚·伯林.2004b,《康德:一个鲜为人知的民族主义源头》.《现实感》.潘荣荣,林茂译.南京:译林出版社.
  • 9约翰·格雷.2002,《自由主义的两张面孔》.顾爱彬,李瑞华译.南京:江苏人民出版社.
  • 10Berlin, Isaiah 1991, "The Bent Twig: On the Rise of Nationalism," in I. Berlin, Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas, (ed.) by Henry Hardy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

二级参考文献31

  • 1约翰·罗尔斯 万俊人译.政治自由主义[M].译林出版社,2000..
  • 2罗尔斯 万俊人译.《政治自由主义》[M].译林出版社,2000年版.第307-308页.
  • 3C·赖特·米尔斯.《社会学的想象力》[M].北京:三联书店,2001年7月第1版..
  • 4Jeffrey C. Isaac, "The Strange Silence of Political Theory", Political Theory,vol. 23. no. 4 (November 1995), pp. 636-520.
  • 5Sheldon S. Wolin. "Political Theory as a Vocation," American Political Science Review 63 (1969): 1062-1082.
  • 6Ruth Chang, ed.Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997).
  • 7George Crowder, "Pluralism and Liberalism," Politioal Studies 42 (1994),pp. 293-305.
  • 8Isaiah Berlin and Bernard Williams, "Pluralism and Liberalism: A Reply," Political Studies 42 (1994), pp. 306-09.
  • 9Amy Gutmann, "Liberty and Pluralism in Pursuit of the Non-Ideal," Social Research, vol. 66, no. 4 (Winter 1999), pp. 1-26.
  • 10George Crowder, Liberalism and Value Pluralism (New York: Continuum Books, 2002).

共引文献14

同被引文献113

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部