摘要
为了比较两种不同治疗方案对持续性不卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)腹膜炎的疗效,我们研究41例CAPD腹膜炎,其中20例(A组)用新方案治疗,21例(B组)用以往常规方案治疗。两组的疗效明显不同,表现为A组治愈率较B组高(94.0%比78.6%,P<0.05);腹膜炎持续时间较B组短(2.8±1.6天比4.0±2.0天,P<0.05);腹膜炎复发率较B组低(159±98.8天比98±99.6天,P<0.05);治疗失败率较B组低(6.0%比21.4%,P<0.05)。研究证明:新方案治疗CAPD腹膜炎疗效优于以往的常规治疗方案。
Forty-one cases of peritonitis caused by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis(CAPD) were studied in order to contrast the efficacies of two sorts treatment programs.Twenty cases of them were treated with new program(group A) and twenty-one with conventional program(group B).The treatment efficacy,however,was different.In group A the rate of cure was higher (94.0%vs 78.6%, P<0.05)and the continuance of peritonitis was shorter (2. 8±1.6 days vs 4.0±2.0days,P<0.05) than those in group B.The recurrence rate (159±98.8 days vs 98± 99. 6 days,P <0. 05)and the failure rate of treatment (6.0% vs 21.4%,P<0.05) in group A were both lower than those in group B.The study demonstrtes that the efficacy of the new program is superior to that of conventional program.Renal Research Institute,Sun Yat-Sen University of Medical Sciences,Guangzhou,510080)
出处
《皖南医学院学报》
CAS
1996年第1期15-17,共3页
Journal of Wannan Medical College
基金
美国中华医学基金会(CMB)资助
关键词
不卧床
腹膜透析
腹膜炎
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
Pertonitis