摘要
目的对比观察埋线疗法与药物治疗经前期综合征的临床疗效,寻找治疗该病的最佳方法。方法将88例病人随机分为埋线组和药物组。埋线组主穴取内关、三阴交、膻中、关元、太冲,配穴取背俞穴;药物组口服氟西汀。治疗3个月经周期后比较两组的疗效。结果埋线组显效26例,有效15例,无效3例,总有效率93.2%;药物组显效12例,有效20例,无效12例,总有效率72.7%。两组间疗效差异有非常显著性意义(P<0.005)。结论埋线疗法治疗本病不失为一种较佳的疗法。
Objective To compare clinical therapeutic effects of acupoint catgut embedding therapy and medicine on premenstrual syndrome, so as to search for the best method for this disease. Methods Eighty-eight cases were randomly divided into a catgut embedding group and a medication group. The catgut embedding group were treated with main points, Neiguan (PC 6), Sanyinjiao (SP 6), Danzhong (CV 17), Guanyuan (CV 4), Taichong (LR 3), and aduvant points, Back-shu, and the medicine group with oral administration of fluoxetine, After treatment of 3 months, their therapeutic effects were compared. Results The therapeutic effect of the catgut embedding group was better than that of the medication group with a very statistically significant difference (P〈0. 005). Conclusion Aeupoint catgut embedding is a better therapy for premenstrual syndrome.
出处
《中国针灸》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第4期265-266,共2页
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
关键词
穴位疗法
埋线
经前期综合征
药物疗法
穴位埋线
Premenstrual Syndrome/acupoint ther
Embedding, Thread
Premenstrual Syndrome/drug ther