期刊文献+

孔结构不同的两种多孔羟基磷灰石陶瓷的性能比较研究 被引量:4

Study on the Property Comparison between Two Interconnected Porous Hroxyapatite Ceramics with Different Pore Structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用有机泡沫浸渍法和注浆成型法分别制备了网孔和球孔结构的羟基磷灰石多孔陶瓷;观察比较了2种多孔体的孔结构,系统地研究了2种孔结构的羟基磷灰石多孔体孔隙率和压缩强度的关系,并进行了体外模拟试验。结果表明:球形孔结构的HA多孔体有较好的抗压缩强度,其中,孔径为200 μm,孔隙率为65%的支架其压缩强度可达 8 MPa左右。体外模拟实验表明2种孔结构羟基磷灰石(HA)支架均有利于细胞的生长。 In the paper, two kinds of porous hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds with different pore structure were fabricated . The pore morphology, size and distribution of scaffolds were characterized using electron microscope. The compressive strength and good compatibleness by vitro cellular assay were tested. The result shows that the scaffolds with spherical macrospore have high compressive strength , among which the scaffold with the pore diameter of 200 μm and porosity of 65% has a compressive strength of 8 MPa. Both the porous biomaterials were proved to have a good compatible by vitro cellular assay. The osteoblast -like cells were attached and spread well throughout the two porous scaffolds.
出处 《硅酸盐通报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期66-68,80,共4页 Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society
关键词 网孔结构 球孔结构 HA 压缩强度 体外模拟 mesh macrospore spherical macrospore HA compressive strength in vitro simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Burg K J L,Porter S,Kellam J F.Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering.Biomaterials,2000,21:47-59.
  • 2吴常生,尹玉姬,杨悦,姚康德.骨组织工程中大孔支架材料制备的研究[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(5):929-931. 被引量:14
  • 3Vacanti C A,Bonassar L J.An overview of tissue engineered bone.Clin Orthop,1999,367(Suppl):S375-381.
  • 4Nam Y S,Park T G.Porous biodegradable polymeric scaffolds prepared by thermally induced phase separation.Biomed MaterRes,1999,47:8.
  • 5和峰,刘昌胜.添加成孔剂法制备孔径、气孔率可控的多孔玻璃陶瓷[J].无机材料学报,2004,19(6):1267-1276. 被引量:9
  • 6Del Real R P,Wolke J G C,Vallet-Regi M,et al.A new method to produce macrospores in calcium phosphate cements.Biomaterials,2002,23:3673-3680.
  • 7赵俊亮,付涛,徐可为.有机泡沫浸渍法制备多孔羟基磷灰石复相陶瓷[J].中国陶瓷,2003,39(1):4-7. 被引量:31
  • 8Murilo D M,Innocentini,Pilar S,et al.Permeability and structure of cellular ceramics:a comparison between two preparation techniques.Communications of the American Ceramic Society,1998,81 (12):3349-3352.
  • 9Rice R W.Comparison of trees concentration versus minimum solid area based mechanical property-porosity relayions.J Mater Sci,1993,28:2187.

二级参考文献13

共引文献49

同被引文献42

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部