期刊文献+

句法结构的认知视角:框架和注意窗理论 被引量:11

A Cognitive Perspective of Syntax: Theories of Frame and Windowing of Attention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 框架理论不同于只注意句法图形和背景的图形/背景理论,而是更多地注意同属一个框架的不同动词的意义问题;又不同于形象/基底理论分别处理认知过程不同层次上的问题,而是描述统一的句型观;也不同于突显理论在每个层次上几乎只关心两个突显实体,在句法层只关心句法图形(主语)和背景(宾语),而是关心更广的范围,包括间接宾语和状语。事件框架分析中的注意窗理论把地点状语视为位移事件框架的路线成分,分析事件框架中某一部分前景化的认知过程,认为在语言表达中,说话人可以用显性表达把路线的某部分前景化,即开启“注意窗”。框架和注意窗理论是认知语言学理论中对语言表层结构较有解释力的理论,能够解释表层句法选择的动因。一些传统上不能很好解释的句法现象在这里可以得到较好的解释。 Frame theory is different from the figure/ground theory which focuses only on the figure and ground of sentences in that it focuses its attention on the semantics of verbs belonging to the same frame, it also differs from the base/profile theory which separately deals with the problems on different levels in cognitive process in that it has a unitary view of syntax. And last, the range of its concern is larger, with indirect object and adverbials included, than the prominence theory which is only concerned with the two prominent entities, especially with the subject and object at syntactic level. The theory of attention in event frame analysis views the adverbial of locetion as the path element of the motion event frame, emphasizing the cognitive process of the foregrounding of a certain element, and holds that in linguistic expressions the speaker can foreground a certain part of the path by explicitly expressing it, that is, by opening the window of attention. The two theories are more powerful than traditional theories and other cognitive linguistic theories in the explanation of syntactic structure.
作者 刘辰诞
出处 《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2006年第2期86-89,103,共5页 Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 框架理论 注意窗 认知 句法结构 frame theory windowing of attention cognition syntactic structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[1]FILLMORE C.The alternative to checklist theories of meaning[M]// Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society.Berkeley:Berkeley Linguistic Society,1975.
  • 2[2]FILLMORE C.The need for a frame semantics within linguistics[M]// Statistical Methods Within Linguistics,1976.
  • 3[3]FILLMORE C.Topics in lexical semantics[M]// In Cole,R.(ed.) Current Issues in Linguistic Theory.Bloomington:Indiana University Press,1977.
  • 4[4]FILLMORE C.Frames and the semantics of understanding[M].Quaderni di Semantica VI,1985.
  • 5[5]FILLMORE C,ATKINS B.Toward a frame-based lexicon:The semantics of RISK and its neighbours[M]// In Lehrer,A.& Kittay,E.(eds.) Frames,Fields,and Contrasts.N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum,1992.
  • 6[6]LANGACKER R.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar,Vol.1,Theoretical Prerequisites[J]// Stanford:Stanford University Press,1987.
  • 7[7]LANGACKER R.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar,Vol.2,Descriptive Application[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press,1991.
  • 8[8]LANGACKER R.Grammar and Conceptualization[M].Berlin:Walter de Gruyter,1999.
  • 9[9]UNGERER F,Schmid H.An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2000.
  • 10[10]TALMY L.Toward a Cognitive Semantics,vol.1[M].Mass.:MIT Press,2000.

同被引文献52

引证文献11

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部