摘要
目的评估WHO《残疾评定量表》(WHO-DASⅡ)应用于残疾运动员功能评定的信度和效度。方法用WHO-DASⅡ测试56名肢体残疾者(26名轮椅篮球运动员和30名普通残疾人),10 d后进行重测,同时以Barthel指数分级和轮椅篮球运动分级作为效标进行效度测试。结果残疾运动员WHO-DASⅡ总分及各领域分值的重测相关系数分别为:0.978、0.807、0.938、0.877、0.998、0.935、0.986,均P<0.01;WHO-DASⅡ总分及各领域分值与Barthel指数之间的相关系数分别为-0.77、0.17、-0.71、-0.82-、0.33、-0.73-、0.61;与运动分级之间的相关系数分别为-0.741-、0.378-、0.806、-0.541、-0.293、-0.510、-0.677。结论可以应用WHO-DASⅡ对残疾运动员进行功能评定、分析及分级。
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the of Disability Assessment Schedule Ⅱ of World Health Organization (WHO-DAS Ⅱ) applied in assessment of the function of disabled athletes. Methods 56 disabled people,26 wheelchair basketball athletes and 30 patients,were sampled and completed WHO-DAS Ⅱ questionnaire. The test and re-test had been administrated in 10 days. Barthel Index (BI) and Sports Classification Test had been implemented for the functioning assessment. Results The test-retest reliability for WHO-DASⅡin six dimensions were: 0. 978, 0. 807, 0. 938, 0. 877, 0. 998, 0. 935, 0. 986 and all were in very significant level (P〈0.01). There were negative correlation between WHO-DAS Ⅱ scores and BI in total and in every dimension, the correlation coefficients were.. -0.77, -0. 17, -0.71, 0.82, --0.33, -0.73, -0.61. The correlation coefficients between WHO-DASⅡ total and six dimensional scores and the grade of sports classification were: - 0. 741, - 0. 378, -0. 806, -0. 541, -0. 293, -0. 510, -0. 677. Conclusion WHI-DASⅡ can be used in assessing the function of disabled athletes.
出处
《中国康复理论与实践》
CSCD
2006年第3期268-269,共2页
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
基金
国务院第二次全国残疾人抽样调查<国际功能
残疾和健康分类及其在残疾调查中的应用>
国家科技基础性工作和社会公益研究专项(2004DIB5J1833)
中国康复研究中心2004年研究项目:<残疾评定量表Ⅱ>标准化研究
关键词
世界卫生组织《残疾评定量表》(WHO-DASⅡ)
国际功能
残疾和健康分类(ICF)
残疾特殊类别分级
运动特殊类
Disability Assessment Schedule Ⅱ of World Health Organization (WHO-DAS II )~International Classifieation ofFunetloning, Disability and Health (ICF)
Impalrment-Speeific Classification System
Sports Specific Classification System