冲突法之悖论:价值取向与技术系统的张力

Paradox of Conflict Law:Value Orientation and Technology System Tensility

在各国冲突法中,普遍存在着两大悖论:从其体现的正义度高低来看,多边主义优于单边主义;而在多边主义中,“实质正义”又优位于“冲突正义”。然而,在实践中,多边主义远未将单边主义逐出冲突法领域;“实质正义”也未取代“冲突正义”成为冲突法的主导价值取向。这两大悖论形成的原因,均可从冲突法之价值取向和技术系统的张力中得到解释。显然,对这两大悖论的处理,关乎我国冲突法之基本立法政策如何确定的问题。就此,虽无整体上的最佳消解办法,但依法律由价值取向和技术系统构成之法理分析,仍可找到次优的安排。

In the conflict laws of many countries, usually there are two paradoxes. From the degree of justice thereof it can be seen that muhilateralism is superior to unilateralism, while in the multilateralism, ＂substantive justice＂ is in the better position ＂conflict justice＂. However, in practice, muhilateralism has not driven the unilateraliam out of the field of conflicts of law at all. ＂Substantive justice＂ has not been the substitutes for ＂conflict justice＂ and not become the leading value orientation of conflict law. The reason for the shaping of the two paradoxes can be found in the value of conflict law and technology system tensility. Obviously, how to deal with the two paradoxes is of great importance to the basic legislative policy regarding China＇ s conflict law. Although there is no perfect way to resolve the problem, a quite good arrangement can be found through jurisprudence analysis that law is composed of value orientation and technology system.