期刊文献+

脑卒中影响量表的测试研究 被引量:32

A research about testing the stroke impact scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用汉化的脑卒中影响量表(SIS)的可行性。方法使用汉化的SIS量表对130例中老年首发脑卒中患者发病后1个月时的生存质量进行评定,并对其中的105例患者在发病后进行为期3个月的随访评定。根据结果对该量表的信度、效度、反应度和可行性进行全面分析。结果SIS量表8个分量表和总量表中表示内部一致性的克朗巴赫α系数(Cronbach′sα)均>0.8,重测结果的组内相关系数ICC(intraclasscorrelation coefficients,ICC)值均>0.7(P<0.05)。各分量表的Pearson相关系数均>0.5(P<0.05)。因子分析法提取的8个因子总共解释总体变量的80%。情绪、ADL/IADL、移动能力、参与4个方面及总分方面的变化差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论汉化SIS量表具有良好的信度、效度、反应度和可行性,可应用于临床和社区护士对中老年脑卒中患者的生存质量和护理效果的评定。 Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using Stroke Impact Scale(Chinese version). Methods Using the SIS(Chinese version) to evaluate the quality of life in 130 wrinkly and elderly with first stroke, and follow up 105 patients among them lasting 3 months. Analyzed the reliability, validity, responsibility and feasibility of SIS(Chinese version). Results The Cronbaeh's a of 8 domains and the total were all 〉0.8, the test - retest ICC of 8 domains and the total were all 〉0.7, the index of Pearson Correlation in 8 domains were all 〉0.5. 8 factors can explain the 80% of the whole variable. There were significant differences in the aspects of emotion, ADL/IADL, moving ability, participating and the total score (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The SIS(Chinese version) showed perfect reliability, validity, responsibility and feasibility. It could be used to evaluate the QOL and the effect of nursing in the wrinkly and elderly with first stroke.
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 2006年第4期3-5,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基金 福建省医学创新课题(编号:2003-CX-6)
关键词 脑卒中 信度 效度 SIS量表 Stroke Reliability Validity Strokes impact scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献15

  • 1陈和年,方积乾.生存质量研究[J].中华预防医学杂志,1993,27(3):178-180. 被引量:36
  • 2万崇华,方积乾.生存质量资料的统计分析方法[J].中华预防医学杂志,1996,30(3):172-174. 被引量:41
  • 3Duncan PW,Wallace D,Lai SM,et al.The stroke impact scale version 2.0 evaluation of reliability,validity,and sensitivity to change.Stroke 1999;30(10):2131- 40
  • 4Seymour DG,Ball AE,Russell EM,et al.Problems in using health survey questionnaires in older patients with physical disabilities.The reliability and validity of the SF 36 and the effect of cognitive impairment.J Eval Clin Pract 2001;7(4):411
  • 5Daving Y,Andren E,Nordholm L,et al.Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure.Clin Rehabil 2001;15(3):301
  • 6Williams LS,Weinberger M,Harris LE,et al.Development of a stroke specific quality of life scale.Stroke 1999;30(7):1362- 9
  • 7Hobart JC,Lamping DL,Freeman JA,et al.Evidence based measurement:which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation.Neurology 2001;57(4):639
  • 8Cohen ME,Marino RJ.The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures.Arch PhysMed Rehabil 2000;81(12):21
  • 9Jiang B,Guo C,Tan LM,et al.Correlation research between the patients with cercbral infrction in differentages.Zhongguo Linchuang Kangfu(中国临床康复 ) 2003;7(1):130- 1
  • 10王家良,康德英,洪旗,廖晓阳,尹国玲,张兰,章茂顺,符宗胤.高血压患者健康相关生存质量的评价研究[J].中华医学杂志,1999,79(8):599-602. 被引量:67

共引文献86

同被引文献378

引证文献32

二级引证文献410

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部