期刊文献+

Using p53-immunostained large specimens to determine the distal intramural spread margin of rectal cancer 被引量:10

Using p53-immunostained large specimens to determine the distal intramural spread margin of rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 瞄准:决定直肠的癌症的远侧的内部传播(阴间的神) 边缘。方法:直肠的癌症的 61 个 p53 积极的标本被使用。在染色的常规苏木精和曙红(H&E ) 以后,在大标本的直肠的癌症的 DIS 边缘被免疫组织化学检验。病人被划分成 A, B, C,和 D 组。在长期的后续以后,四个组的幸存曲线用寿命表被估计。结果:61 个盒子(83.6%) 中的 51 个有阴间的神。阴间的神的程度变化了 0.11-3.5 厘米;同时,阴间的神的平均数由染色的 H&E 测量了是 0.13 厘米。有效差量在工具之间被发现(t=5.622, P【0.0001 ) 。仅仅, 51 个病人中的 1 个有比 3 厘米大的阴间的神。阴间的神是在很直肠的癌症病人的不到 1.0 厘米。长期的结果显示其阴间的神比 1.0 厘米大的病人的幸存率比其阴间的神是不到 0.5 厘米的病人的低。结论:有比 1.0 厘米大的阴间的神的直肠的癌症病人有差的预后。 AIM: To determine the distal intramural spread (DIS) margin of rectal cancer. METHODS: Sixty-one p53-positive specimens of rectal cancer were used. After conventional hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, the DIS margin of rectal cancer in large specimens was examined by immunohistochemistry. The patients were divided into A, B, C, and D groups. After a long-term follow-up, the survival curves of the four groups were estimated using the life table. RESULTS: Fifty-one of the sixty-one cases (83.6%) had DIS. The extent of DIS ranged 0.11-3.5 cm; meanwhile the.mean of DIS measured by H&E staining was 0.13 cm. The significant difference was found between the means (t=5.622, P〈0.0001). Only 1 of 51 patients had DIS greater than 3 cm. The DIS was less than 1.0 cm in most rectal cancer patients. The long-term results indicated that the survival rate of the patients whose DIS was greater than 1.0 cm was lower than that of the patients whose DIS was less than 0.5 cm. CONCLUSION: Rectal cancer patients with DIS greater than 1.0 cm have poor prognosis.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2006年第10期1626-1629,共4页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 直肠癌 病理机制 治疗 临床表现 Rectal cancer Distal intramural spread p53 Immunohistochemistry Large specimen
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[1]Zaheer S,Pemberton JH,Farouk R,Dozois RR,Wolff BG,Ilstrup D.Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum.Ann Surg 1998; 227:800-811
  • 2[2]Goligher JC,Dukes CE,Bussey HJ.Local recurrences after sphincter saving excisions for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid.Br J Surg 1951; 39:199-211
  • 3[3]Vernava AM 3rd,Moran M,Rothenberger DA,Wong WD.A prospective evaluation of distal margins in carcinoma of the rectum.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 175:333-336
  • 4[4]Shirouzu K,Isomoto H,Kakegawa T.Distal spread of rectal cancer and optimal distal margin of resection for sphincterpreserving surgery.Cancer 1995; 76:388-392
  • 5[5]Moore HG,Riedel E,Minsky BD,Saltz L,Paty P,Wong D,Cohen AM,Guillem JG.Adequacy of 1-cm distal margin after restorative rectal cancer resection with sharp mesorectal excision and preoperative combined-modality therapy.Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:80-85
  • 6[6]Takayama O,Yamamoto H,Ikeda K,Ishida H,Kato T,Okuyama M,Kanou T,Fukunaga M,Tominaga S,Morita S,Fujie Y,Fukunaga H,Ikenaga M,Ikeda M,Ohue M,Sekimoto M,Kikkawa N,Monden M.Application of RT-PCR to clinical diagnosis of micrometastasis of colorectal cancer:A translational research study.Int J Oncol 2004; 25:597-604
  • 7[7]Sondenaa K,Kjellevold KH.A prospective study of the length of the distal margin after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.Int J Colorectal Dis 1990; 5:103-105
  • 8[8]Baker SJ,Preisinger AC,Jessup JM,Paraskeva C,Markowitz S,Willson JK,Hamilton S,Vogelstein B.p53 gene mutations occur in combination with 17p allelic deletions as late events in colorectal tumorigenesis.Cancer Res 1990; 50:7717-7722
  • 9[9]Brennan JA,Mao L,Hruban RH,Boyle JO,Eby YJ,Koch WM,Goodman SN,Sidransky D.Molecular assessment of histopathological staging in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.N Engl J Med 1995; 332:429-435
  • 10[10]Hayashi N,Ito I,Yanagisawa A,Kato Y,Nakamori S,Imaoka S,Watanabe H,Ogawa M,Nakamura Y.Genetic diagnosis of lymph-node metastasis in colorectal cancer.Lancet 1995; 345:1257-1259

同被引文献64

引证文献10

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部