期刊文献+

PGV方案与GV方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效比较 被引量:1

Comparison of PGV and GV regimen in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较以铂类为基础的三药方案与不含铂类的两药方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的近期疗效和不良反应,为临床治疗提供指导.方法:24例Ⅲ~Ⅳ期NSCLC采用PGV方案(顺铂+健择+长春瑞滨)化疗,31例Ⅲ~Ⅳ期NSCLC采用GV方案(健择+长春瑞滨)化疗.两方案均每3周重复,至少2个周期.结果:两组有效率、中位缓解期相近,A、B两组中位生存期分别为11个月、10个月,1年生存率分别为41.7%、41.9%.结论:铂类方案与非铂类方案治疗晚期NSCLC疗效相近(P>0.05),非铂类方案不良反应较铂类方案为轻,均可耐受.21天GV方案更安全、更经济,推荐作为治疗NSCLC的一线方案. Objective: From January 2000 to December 2002, three-drug, platinum-based regimen ( PGV ) : [ cisplatin (DDP) + gemcitabine (GEM) + vinorelbine (VNB) ] and two-drug combination without a platinum drug (GV) : [ gemcitabine (GEM) + vinorelbine (VNB) ] had been used to treat 55 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The response and major adverse reaction were analyzed and compared. Methods : Twenty-four cases of advanced NSCLC ( stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ ) patients were treated with PGV (DDP 35mg/m^2 d1 -d3; GEM 1 250mg/m^2 d1 ,d8 ). The other 31 cases were treated with GV (GEM 1 250mg/m^2 d1 ,d8; VNB 25mg/m^2 d1 ,d8 ). The two regimens were repeated every 3 weeks for 6 courses. Results:In PGV group, the overall response rate was 45.8% (CR + PR = 11 ), medium response time was 5.5 months, medium survival time was 11 months and 1-year survival rate 41.7%. In GV group, the overall response rate was 48.4% (CR +PR = 15), medium response time, survival time and 1-year survival rate were 6.5, 10 months and 41.9%, respectively. The major toxicities were nausea/vomiting, myelosuppression in PGV group, myelosuppression and phlebitis in GV group, respectively. Conclusion:PGV and GV regimen for advanced NSCLC have similar response rate (P 〉 0. 05 ). Two-drug combination without a platinum drug is less toxic than three-drug, platinum-based regimen. GV can be used as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.
出处 《临床肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2006年第3期188-189,192,共3页 Chinese Clinical Oncology
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 健择 长春瑞滨 顺铂 联合化疗 Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Gemcitabine Vinorelbine Cisplatin Combination chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Krajnik G,Mohn-Staudner A,Thaler J,et al.Vinorelbine-gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC):an AASLC Phase Ⅱ trial.Austrian association for the study of lung cancer[J].Ann Oncol,2000,11:993 -998.
  • 2Gridelli C,Cigolari S,Gallo C,et al.Activity and toxicity of gemcitabine and gemcitabine-Vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer elderly patients:phase Ⅱ data from the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES)radomized trial[J].Lung Cancer,2001,31:227-284.
  • 3Frasi G,Lorusso V,Panza N,et al.Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine alone in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2000,18 (13):2529-2536.
  • 4Gridelli C,Perrone F,Cigolar S,et al.The MILES(Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study) phase Ⅲ trial:gemcitabine + Vinorelbine vs vinorelbine and vs gemcitabine in elderly advanced NSCLC patients[abstract 1230][C].Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2001,20:308a.
  • 5Greco FA,Gray JR,Jr,Thompson DS,et al.Prospective randomized study of four novel chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma[J].Cancer,2002,95(6):1279-1285.

同被引文献19

  • 1Non-small cell lung cancer collaborative group. Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a Meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials[J].BMJ, 1995, 311(7010) :899-909.
  • 2Catherine Delbaldo, Stefan Michiels, Nathalie Syz, et al. Bene fits of adding a drug to a single-agent or a 2-agent chemotherapy regimen in advanced non small-cell lung cancer: a Meta analysis [J]. JAMA, 2004, 292(4):470-484.
  • 3Squires TS, Tong T. Cancer statistics[J].CA Cancer J Clin, 1993, 43(1):7- 26.
  • 4Rudd R. Chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Respir Dis Pract, 1991, 7:12 -15.
  • 5Ioannis Boukovinas, Pads Kosmidis. Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients with performance status2 (PS2)[J]. Lung Cancer, 2009, 63110-15.
  • 6Paccagnella A, Oniga F, Bearz A, et al. Adding gemcitabine to paclitaxel/carboplatin combination increases survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:results of a phase II- IlI study[J].J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(4):681-687.
  • 7Laack E, Dickgreber N, Muuller T, et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine and vinorelbine versus gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:from the german and swiss lung cancer study group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22 (12) ,2348-2356.
  • 8Emilio EG, Noemi V, Joaquin F, et al. Gemcitabine and vinorelbine (GV) versus cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine (CGV) as first-line treatment in advanced non small cell lung cancer,Results of a prospective randomized phase II study [J]. Investigational New Drugs, 2006, 24(3):241 -248.
  • 9Emilio E, Jose-Luis S, Noemi V, et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine with or without vinorelbine as induction chemotherapy prior to radical loeoregional treatment for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) :Results of a prospective randomized study[J]. Lung Cancer, 2007, 55(2) :173-180.
  • 10F Anthony G, James RG, Dana ST, et al. Prospective random ized study of four novel chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma a minnie pearl ccancer re search networktrial[J]. Cancer, 2002, 95(6):1279- 1285.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部