期刊文献+

它山之石,可以攻玉——美国大学生建模竞赛之评审与评述 被引量:1

The Judge and Commentary of American Undergraduate Contests in Modeling
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文介绍美国大学生数学建模竞赛(MCM)和交叉学科建模竞赛(ICM)的评审办法,总结美国赛历年优秀论文的评述,对比美国赛与全国赛的异同,指出美国赛中可供借鉴的方方面面。 This paper introduces the judging method of American undergraduate mathematical contest in modeling (MCM) and the interdisciplinary contest in modeling (ICM), summarizes judge's commentaries of these contests, and compares MCM/ICM with China undergraduate mathematical contests in modeling, we point out some American methods which could be used for our reference.
作者 胡代强
机构地区 暨南大学数学系
出处 《工程数学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第8期134-138,共5页 Chinese Journal of Engineering Mathematics
基金 广东省自然科学基金(031904).
关键词 美国大学生数学建模竞赛 交叉学科建模竞赛 评审 American undergraduate mathematical contest in modeling the interdisciplinary contest in modeling judging
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Fox William P. Judge's commentary: the outstanding student person papers[J]. The UMAP Journal, 2003,24(3): 317-322
  • 2Giordano Frank. Contest director's commentary: judging the MCM[J]. The UMAP Journal, 1996, 17(3):341-344
  • 3Harper Steve. Practitioner's commentary: computer support for the MCM[J]. The UMAP Journal, 1996,17(3): 345-348
  • 4Driscoll Patrick J. Judge's commentary: the outstanding wind and waterspray papers[J]. The UMAP Journal, 2002,23(3):267-271

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部