摘要
精神损害赔偿是民商法理论中最具争议的问题之一。最高人民法院关于精神损害赔偿的司法解释并没有使争议得到解决,反而使该争论变得愈演愈烈。依据最高人民法院的司法解释,笔者认为精神权益包括生理、心理上的感受和状态;精神性人格权益;财产权、身份权中内涵的精神利益等三大内容,并对精神损害即是精神痛苦的法理进行了阐释。主张精神损害赔偿在实践操作中应予扩大化。
The award for the emotional injury is one of the fierce problems argued in the world of the Civil Law and Commercial Law and the judicial explanatory statement made by the Supreme People's Court hasn't completely settled the argument. On the contrary ,the statement ,has pushed some points into further argument. According to the understanding of the judicial statement, the writer thinks the mental rights should contain three parts the feeling and state both physiological and psychological , emotionally human rights and the emotional interests concentrating on property rights and identity rights. The essay centers on some explanations on the theory of law about the emotional sufferings which means the emotional injury, holds the viewpoint that the practice of the award for the emotional injury ,should be extended and the nature of the award for disability and death should be union of the award for both the property damage and emotional injury.
出处
《行政与法》
2006年第2期66-68,共3页
Administration and Law
关键词
精神
精神利益
精神损害
Emotion
Emotional benefits
Emotional Damage