期刊文献+

浅论《十七史商榷》中的“议论”、“褒贬” 被引量:2

Comment and appraisment" for the Discussion of Seventeen Ancient Historial Work
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《十七史商榷序》明确反对对史书的“议论褒贬”,但《十七史商榷》对典制史事的议论褒贬不在少数,二者并不矛盾。王鸣盛反对的是那种热衷于评论、不辨史实真伪的“议论褒贬”。其主旨是突出《十七史商榷》考据成就,同时也体现了乾嘉时代的“求实”精神。 Through analysing Wang Ming-Sheng's view of "comment and appraisment" and some examples in Discussion of the Seventeen Ancient Historial Work, this author reaches a conclusion that Wang Ming- Sheng made no difficulty for historian comment and appraisment; but he was against comment and appraisment coming from those who had read Seventeen Ancient Historial Work but didn't examine and correct mistakes. The purpose is to highlight textual research achievements of the Discussion of Seveuteen Ancient Nistorical Work and also embody the practical spirit of the time.
作者 刘玲
机构地区 安徽大学历史系
出处 《中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第1期114-118,共5页 Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词 王鸣盛 《十七史商榷》 “议论褒贬” Wang Ming-Sheng The Discussion of Seventeen Ancient Historial Work comment and appraisment
  • 相关文献

同被引文献3

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部