期刊文献+

庄老异同 被引量:1

The Similarity and Difference between Zhuangzi and Laozi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自晋以后,老庄并称,都归入道家者流。文章旨在辨明两书思想本质的异同,以异为主。两家都用了“道”与“无为”的概念,究其实质,名同实异。著书态度、目的及思想出发点也截然不同。至于老子对“无为”以及与之相应的“无私”的解释,更是迥然有别。老子书中的比喻,反映其自然观之肤浅,其教训意义未必可取。最后并指出老子书中有儒家《易》、《礼》及名家思想的成分,显得驳杂。 Since Jin Time, Laozi and Zhuangzi became one school of thought belonging to Daoism. The paper aims at illustration of similarity and difference of the two books in thinking by nature, but mainly the latter. Both writers adopted the concept of "Dao" and "Wuwei", but their profound meanings are quite different. Their purpose, aim and attitude toward the books are also quite different. The explanation of "Wuwei" and its counterpart "Wusi" by Laozi is extremely different. The analogy in Laozi's book reflects skin-deep ideas of nature ,and its lessons may not be adoptable. Finally the paper states the ideas of those famous thinkers in Laozi's book such as "Yi", "Li" seems critic but confusing.
作者 王运生
出处 《昆明师范高等专科学校学报》 2006年第1期36-38,45,共4页 Journal of Kunming Teachers College
关键词 庄子 老子 思想本质 异同比较 Zhuangzi Laozi the essence of thought comparison of similarity and difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1(晋)郭象 注(唐)成玄英疏刘文典 补正庄子补正[M].

同被引文献14

  • 1廖群.庄子与老子关系的新审视——以《庄子·内篇》和简本《老子》为据[J].理论学刊,2005(11):27-30. 被引量:5
  • 2陈鼓应.《庄子今注今译》,北京:中华书局,1983年,第588、324页.
  • 3《庄子》内七篇.
  • 4王博.《庄子哲学》,北京:北京大学出版社,2005年,第52页.
  • 5《庄子·外杂篇》.
  • 6陈鼓应.《庄子今注今译》[M].北京中华书局,1996年版.P884.
  • 7.《庄子今注今译》[M].,.第78页.
  • 8.《论语》[M].,..
  • 9.《老子》[M].,..
  • 10.《人间世》[M].,.第155页.

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部