期刊文献+

大剂量足叶乙甙和G-CSF用于恶性血液病外周血造血干/祖细胞动员 被引量:3

High-dose Etoposide with Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor for Mobilization of Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem/Progenitor Cells in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了观察大剂量足叶乙甙(VP16)和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)在恶性血液病人动员采集自体外周血造血干/祖细胞的有效性和安全性,对10例恶性血液病患者(多发性骨髓瘤6例,非霍奇金淋巴瘤4例),第1天用足叶乙甙1.6g/m2静脉持续滴注10小时,第3天起给予G-CSF5μg/kg,每日1次,皮下注射,直至采集结束。结果显示:用VP16后平均第11(9-13)天开始外周血造血干/祖细胞单采,获CD34+细胞9.4×106/kg(4.2-17.3×106/kg),每例CD34+细胞>4.0×106/kg。平均采集次数2.6(1-4)次。1例发生口咽黏膜炎、2例尿道炎、咽喉炎。结论:足叶乙甙1.6g/m2和G-CSF5μg/kg是恶性血液病动员采集自体干祖细胞的有效安全方案。 To explore the efficacy and safety of high-dose of etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells, 10 patients with hematologic malignancies including 6 patients with multiple myeloma and 4 with non Hodgkin's lymphoma received an etoposide dose of 1.6 g/m^2. The total close of undiluted etopogde was given on day 1 as a continuous intravenous infusion via a central vein for 10 hours. G-CSF 5 μg/kg was used on day 3 and given daily subcutaneously until leukopheresis was completed. The results showed that leukopheresis was started at days 11 (range 9 - 13 days) following etoposide therapy, the mean number of CD34^+ cells collected in all 10 patients was 9.4 × 10^6/kg (range 4.2-17.3 × 10^6/kg), by an average of 2.6 leukophereses (range 1 -4) times. Mobilization procedure that produced yields of greater than 4.0 × 10^6/kg were achieved in every patient. Toxicity showed oropharyngeal mucosifis, faucifis and urethritis respectively in 3 patients. It is concluded that high-dose etoposide with G-CSF is an effective and safe mobilizing regimen for autologous peripheral blood stem progenitor cells in patients with hematologic malignancies.
出处 《中国实验血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2006年第2期397-399,共3页 Journal of Experimental Hematology
基金 江苏省基础研究计划重大招标项目(编号:160DC0401) 江苏省社会发展基金项目(编号:160DB0301) 江苏省卫生厅基金(编号:H200313) 南京医科大学创新基金(编号:CX2001004)
关键词 足叶乙甙 多发性骨髓瘤 非霍奇金淋巴瘤 G-CSF 外周血造血干/祖细胞 milfiple myeloma non Hodgkin's lymphoma etoposid G-CSF peripheral blood stem/progenitor cell
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Gianni AM,Bregni M,Siena S,et al.Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor infusion makes high-dose etoposide a safe outpatient regimen that is effective in lymphoma and myeloma patients.J Clin Oncol,1992;10:1955-1962.
  • 2Copelan EA,Ceselski SK,Ezzone SA,et al.Mobilization of peripheral-blood progenitor cell with high-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with breast cancer,nonHodgkin's lymphoma,and Hodgkin's disease.J Clin Oncol,1997; 15:759-765.
  • 3Kanfer EJ,McGuigan D,Samson D,et al.High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cell:efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels.Br J Cancer,1998; 78:928-932.
  • 4Okamura K,Mizutani K,Haltori R,et al.Peripheral blood stem cell harvest for patients with germ cell rumors.Hinyokika Kiyo,2001; 47:397-403.
  • 5Arery RK,Pohlman BL,Mossad SB,et al.The efficacy of prophylactic outpatient antibiotics for the prevention of neutropenic fever associated with high-dose etoposide (VP-16) for stem cell mobilization.Bone Marrow Transplant,2002; 30:311-314.
  • 6Junghanss C,Leithauser M,Wilhelm S,et al.High-dose etoposide phosphate and G-CSF mobilizes peripheral blood stem cells in patients that previously failed to mobilize.Ann Hematol,2001;80:96-102.
  • 7Bolwell BT,Kuczkowski E,Rybicki L,et al.The kinetics of etoposide (VP-16) peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization.Blood,2004; 104:4993a.

同被引文献30

  • 1血液病/恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性真菌感染的诊断标准与治疗原则(修订版)[J].中华内科杂志,2007,46(7):607-610. 被引量:250
  • 2Koistinen P, Raty R, Itala M, et al. Long-term outcome of intensive chemotherapy for adults with de novo acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) : the nationwide AML-92 study by the Finnish Leukaemia Group. Eur J Haematol, 2007 ;78:477 -486.
  • 3Auberger J, Clausen J, Willenbacher W, et al. Fludarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine with or without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in poor-risk leukemia: a single center experience. Int J Hematol. 2008 : 87:382 - 386.
  • 4Ball ED, Lister J, Law P. Hematopoietic stem cell therapy. Churchill Livingstone. 2000;270 - 280.
  • 5Gandhi V, Plunkett W. Cellular and clinical pharmacology of fludarabine. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2002 ;41:93 - 103.
  • 6Vidarsson B, Abonour R, Williams EC, et al. Fludarabine and cytarabine as a sequential infusion regimen for treatment of adults with recurrent, refractory or poor prognosis acute leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma,2001 ;41:321 -331.
  • 7Hubeek I, Litvinova E, Peters GJ, et al. The effect of G-CSF on the in vitro cytotoxicity of cytarabine and fludarabine in the FLAG combination in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Int J Oncol,2004;25: 1823 - 1829.
  • 8Higasbi Y, Turzanski J, Pallis M, et al. Contrasting in vitro effects for the combination of fludarabine, cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (FLAG) compared with daunorubicin and Ara-C in P-glycoprotein-positive and P-glycoprotein-negative acute myeloblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol, 2000 ; 111 : 565 -569.
  • 9Ferrara F, Palmieri S, Pocali B, et al. De novo acute myeloid leukemia with multilineage dysplasia: treatment results and prognostic evaluation from a series of 44 patients treated with fludurabine, cytarabine and G-CSF (FLAG). Eur J Haematol,2002 ;68:203 -209.
  • 10Visani G, Lemoli RM, Tosi P, et al. Fludarabin-containing regimens severely impair peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and collection in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Br J Haematol,1999 ;105 :775 - 779.

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部