情理与法的冲突:呼唤刑事附带民事的公费辅助补偿——“马加爵案”刑事附带民事判决的法理评析

A Conflict of Passion,Truth and Law:Commenting on the Supplementary Civil Compensation in People v.Ma Jia-jue

从“马加爵案”刑事附带民事判决的合法性、合理性和可执行上可以看出,该案民事判决部分的合法性虽然能够得到证明,但是欠缺合理性;而且生效判决难以执行。显露出我国刑事附带民事赔偿制度存在着情理法的严重冲突。解决的办法是对附带民事赔偿采取全面赔偿的原则,并有必要建立刑事附带民事的公费辅助补偿制度。

By analyzing the legitimacy, justification and enforceability of the supplementary civil compensation in State v. Ma Jia-jue, this author determines that there lacks some rationale in the judgment, though some legitimacy can be testified. Furthermore, the judgment of last resort can hardly be enforced, which reveals that in China, a sharp conflict of passion, truth and law exists in the supplementary civil compensation in a criminal case. This author advocates an overall compensation principle in the supplementary civil compensation framework and maintains that a public-assisted supplementary compensation system should be established.