期刊文献+

公平偏好与锦标激励 被引量:19

Fairness Preferences and Tournament Incentives
原文传递
导出
摘要 行为合约理论认为代理人具有公平偏好,会关注自己的物质收益与他人相比是否公平,因而试图建立包含公平偏好的最优激励合约。在锦标激励中,这种公平偏好一方面是由于参与约束效应会降低代理人的努力程度,另一方面是由于激励相容约束效应提高代理人的努力程度,参与约束效应占主导作用,在最优的锦标激励制度下公平偏好会降低代理人的努力程度和委托人的期望收益水平。因此积极识别员工的公平偏好对企业制定恰当的锦标激励制度具有重要意义。 Behavioral contract theory tries to design optimal incentive contracts based on fairness preferences, which mean that agents will pay attention to the comparisons of his payoff and others. In tournament contests, the fairness preferences on one hand will reduce efforts of agents because of participation constraint effect, and on the other hand will increase efforts of agents because of incentive compatibility constraint effect. But the participation constraint effect is the dominant power and the fairness preferences will reduce the efforts of agents and therefore the expected profit of principal. So it is very important for corporations to screen and evaluate precisely the fairness preferences of employees when designing the tournament system.
出处 《管理科学》 CSSCI 2006年第2期42-47,共6页 Journal of Management Science
关键词 公平偏好 锦标激励 行为合约理论 fairness preferences tournament incentives behavioral contract theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Lazear, Rosen. Rank-Order Tournament as Optimum Labor Contracts [ J ] . Journal of Political Economy,1981,89(5) :841 -864.
  • 2Camerer, Thaler. Ultimatums, Dictators and Manners[ J ] . Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995,9 (2) :209 -219.
  • 3Falk, Fehr, Fischbacher. Testing Theories of Fairness-Intentions Matter [ R 1. University of Zurich Working Paper, 1998.
  • 4Berg, Dickhaut, McCabe. Trust, Reciprocity and Social History [ J ]. Games and Economic Behavior,1995,10( 1 ) :122 - 142.
  • 5Andreoni, Miller. Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma:Experimental Evidence[ J ] . Economic Journal, 1993,103 (418) :570 - 585.
  • 6Fehr, Gacher. Cooperation and Punishments in .Public Goods Experiments [ J ]. American Economic Review, 2000,90 ( 4 ) : 980 - 994.
  • 7Englmaier, Wambach. Contracts and Inequity Aversion[ R ] . Munich : University of Munich, 2002.
  • 8Biel. Inequity Aversion and Team Incentives [ R ].London : Unversity College London, 2004.
  • 9Grund,Sliwka. Envy and Compassion in Tournaments [ J ] . Journal of Economics & Management Strategy,2005,14 ( 1 ) : 187 - 207.
  • 10Lazear. Pay Equality and Industrial Politics [ J ].Journal of Political Economy, 1989, 97 ( 3 ) : 561 -580.

同被引文献276

引证文献19

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部