评“王钟之争”及其后续争论的三个问题

On Controversy Between Wang Ce and Zhong Qi Quan and Three Questions in Follow-up Debates

“王钟之争”及其后续争论揭开了新课程背后的理论分歧的面纱,它在使分歧尖锐化和公开化的同时,也给向来是一团和气的教育理论界注入了竞争的活力。但争论中也暴露出一些问题,主义之争、观点驾驭事实而不是从事实出发、争论中攻其一点不及其余的现象,这些问题的存在,都可能影响争论的质量以及理论研讨的深入。为引起学界对这些问题的重视,本文指出“王钟之争”及其后续争论中的三个问题,并对其理论失误做了具体分析和评论。

The controversy between Wang Ce and Zhong Qi-quan and follow-up debates unveil the disparities in theories behind the new course curriculum of politics. This not only has intensified and made known the disparities but also introduced vigorous competition into the theoretical circles. However, such problems as differences in doctrines, opinions ruling facts, focusing merely on one aspect in the debates may affect the quality of the debate and depth of the theoretical discussions. In order to draw attention from the circles, the essay points out the controversy and three questions in follow-up debates, and then analyses and comments on the theoretical mistakes in them.