期刊文献+

退耕还林对土壤抗冲能力的强化效应

The strengthen effects on the anti-rush ability of the soil of the returning land for farming to forestry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 抗冲性是土壤生态系统在抵抗面状侵蚀和线状侵蚀过程中所表现出的一种重要性能,主要受植物群落和土壤特征的影响。通过采用索波列夫抗冲法试验,结果表明:①退耕还林3年后,林地10、30、50 cm三个土层的平均产流历时比坡耕地延长1.2、0.87、0.52 s,地表迳流量比坡耕地减少5.216、4.286、2.613 L/m2,土壤抗冲性比坡耕地增强0.277、0.255、0.206 kg/(m2.min);②土层越深,退耕还林对土壤产流历时的延长效应就越短,对土壤产流量的减弱效应就越小,对土壤抗冲性的强化效应就越低;③退耕还林对坡面产流历时的延长效应、对坡面产流量的减弱效应及对土壤抗冲性的强化效应随土壤母质的不同而差别很大。 The anti-rush ability is a main characteristic of the soil ecological system in the planar and filamentary corroding courses, and be affected by plants community and soil's characteristics. Based on the Sobolev anti - rush experiment, the results shewed that: ① After three years of the Returning Land for Farming to Forestry Project, according to the three kind layer of soil of forest land in 10cm, 30 cm and 50 cm, the average time of runoff generation in forestry had been extend 1.2 s, 0.87 s and 0.52 s than it in the hillside cultivated, the direct runoff rate in forestry had been decreased 5.216, 4.286 and 2.613 L/m^2 than it in the hillside cultivated, and the anti-rush ability of the soil in forestry had been increased 0.277, 0.255 and 0. 206 kg/m^2· rain than it in the hillside cultivated. ② More thicker in the layer of soil, more shorter effects in the extending time of runoff generation, more lower effects in the direct runoff rate of soil, and more lower in the strengthen effects in the anti-rush ability of soil. ③The obvious different effects in the different soil parent material in slope in following effects: the extending effects of the time of runoff generation, the lower effects of runoff yield and the strengthen effects of the anti-rush ability.
出处 《湖南林业科技》 2006年第2期28-32,共5页 Hunan Forestry Science & Technology
基金 湖南省林业厅重点项目"湖南省退耕还林工程效益监测"研究内容之一
关键词 土壤抗冲能力 强化效应 退耕还林 湖南省 anti-rush ability of soil strengthen effects the returning land for farming to forestry Hunan
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献20

  • 1卢宗凡,梁一民,刘国斌.水土保持科学研究的基本思路[J].水土保持通报,1994,14(1):7-11. 被引量:9
  • 2田育新.洞庭湖水系林地土壤流失规律研究[J].湖南林业科技,1995,22(4):12-17. 被引量:1
  • 3黄秉维.编制黄河中游流域土壤侵蚀分区图的经验教训[J].科学通报,1955,(12):15-21.
  • 4朱显谟.有关黄河中游土壤侵蚀区划问题[J].土壤通报,1956,(1):1-6.
  • 5朱显谟.黄土区土壤侵蚀与分类[J].土壤学报,1956,4(2):99-105.
  • 6[8]Renard K D, Forste G D, Weesies G. A. Prediction rainfall erosion by water: a guild to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). USDA Agricultural Handbook, 1997(703)
  • 7[9]Laflen J M . WEPP A new generation of erosion prediction technology. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1991, 46( 1 ): 34-38
  • 8[10]Morgan R P C, Quinton J N, Smith R E, et al. The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): Documentation and User Guide (Version3.6) [ Z. http: ∥ www. cranfield. ac. uk/coa ].Silsoe College, Cranfield University, 1998
  • 9[11]De Roo A P J, Wesseling C G, Ritsema C J. LISEM: A Single-Event Physically Based Hydrological and Soil Erosion Model for Drainage Basins. I: Theory. Input and Output. Hydrological Processes, 1996 (10): 1107-1118
  • 10[12]Williams J R, Renard. EPIC-A new method for assessing erosion' s effect on soil productivity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1983, 38(5): 381-383

共引文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部