期刊文献+

胸腰椎骨折X线平片螺旋CT三维及多平面重建的对比分析 被引量:19

Comparative analysis between routine plain radiographs,helical CT plain scans,3D and MPR in the detection of thoracolumbar fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较和评价X线平片、螺旋CT平扫、三维和多平面重建在胸腰椎骨折诊断中的作用及优势与不足。方法对42例经X线平片、螺旋CT平扫、三维和多平面重建确诊为胸腰椎骨折的病例进行对比分析。结果螺旋CT平扫、三维和多平面重建在显示椎体、椎板、小关节骨折及椎管狭窄方面明显优于X线平片;X线平片、三维和多平面重建在显示椎体压缩、椎体后突成角畸形方面基本一致,但明显优于螺旋CT平扫。结论胸腰椎骨折影像诊断X线平片是基础,CT检查是主要手段,三维和多平面重建是补充,三者结合可详尽反映椎体损伤情况。 Objective To compare the advantages and limitations between routine plain radiographs, helical CT plain scans, 3D and MPR in the detection of thoraeolumbar fractures. Methods Imaging findings of thoracolumbar fractures obtained from routine plain radiographs, helical CT plain scans, three dimensional(3D)and muhiplanar reconstruction(MPR)were analyzed comparatively in 42 eases. Resglts In displaying the fractures of vertebral bodies, vertebral plates and small joints, helical CT plain scanning,3D and MPR were obviously superior to routine plain radiographs. In displaying the compression of vertebral bodies and the angled deformity of vertebral posterior processus, routine plain radiographs, helical CT 3D and MPR were basically coresponding but obviously superior to helical CT plain scanning. Conclusion In the diagnosis of thoracolumbar fractures, routine plain radiograph is a basis, CT is main tool while helical CT 3D and MPR are important supplement. The integration of above 3 modalities can clearly display the details of thoracolumbar injury.
出处 《实用医学影像杂志》 2006年第2期84-86,共3页 Journal of Practical Medical Imaging
关键词 外伤 胸腰椎骨折 X线摄影 CT Trauma Thoracolumbar fracture Radiography Tomagraphy, X - ray computed
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1杨志云,刘剑锋.脊柱创伤的CT影像[J].中华放射学杂志,1993,27(8):557-559. 被引量:32
  • 2[1]Gertzbein SD. Scoliosis Research Society: multicenter spine fracture study. Spine 1992;17:528-40.
  • 3[2]Dai LY, Jia LS. Multiple non-contiguous injuries of the spine.Injury 1996;27:573-5.
  • 4[3]Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 1983;8:817-31.
  • 5[4]Atlas SW, Regenbogen V, Rogers LF, et al. The radiographic characterization of burst fractures of the spine. Am J Roentgenol 1986;147:575-82.
  • 6[5]Dai LY, Yao WF, Cui YM, et al. Thoracolumbar fractures in multiply injured patients: diagnosis and treatment-A review of 147cases. J Trauma 2004;56:348-55.
  • 7[6]McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW. The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine 1994;19:1741-4.
  • 8[7]Dai LY, Jin WJ. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the load sharing classification in the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 2004;in press.
  • 9[8]McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Fredrickson BE, et al. The value of computed tomography in thoracolumbar fractures: an analysis of one hundred consecutive cases and a new classification. J Bone JT Surg (Am) 1983;65:461-73.
  • 10[9]Guerra J Jr, Garfin SR, Resnick D. Vertebral burst fractures: CT anslysis of the retropulsed fragment. Radiology 1984; 153:769-72.

共引文献183

同被引文献51

引证文献19

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部