期刊文献+

硝化速率法用于活性污泥活性测试的研究 被引量:7

Study on nitrification inhibition for measuring of activity of activated sludge
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以城市污水厂回流污泥中的硝化细菌(氨氧化细菌和亚硝酸盐氧化细菌)为受试生物,HgCl2为标准毒性物质,通过对两组实验———氨氧化速率实验(NH4+-N→NO2--N)和亚硝酸盐氧化速率实验(NO2--N→NO3--N)的研究表明,氨氧化细菌对HgCl2的灵敏度(IC50=0.034 mmol/L)明显高于亚硝酸盐氧化细菌(IC50=0.20 mmol/L)。氨氧化速率法测试活性污泥活性时,使用NH4+-N或NOX--N指标需要120 min或更长的时间,但使用NO2--N指标仅需30 min就可完成测试,而且结果重现性要比NH4+-N和NOX--N好,其变异系数CV为5.9%。 Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter, which were contained in activated sludge, were used for measuring of activity of activated sludge, and HgCl2 was chosen as the standard toxicant. Two methods ammonia oxidation and nitrite oxidation were studied respectively, and higher sensitivity was found with Nitrosornonas than with Nitrobacter (IC50=0. 034 mmol/L for Nitrosomonas, IC50 = 0.20 mmol/L for Nitrobacter). When using ammonia oxidation for measuring activity of activated sludge, NH4^+-N or NOx^--N could be determined, but more than 120 min were needed for good results. While NO2^--N was determined, good results could be obtained within 30 min with the smaller stand- ard deviation of the IC50 (CV= 5.9%).
出处 《环境污染与防治》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期264-266,287,共4页 Environmental Pollution & Control
关键词 活性污泥活性 氨氧化细菌 亚硝酸盐氧化细菌 半数抑制浓度 Activity of activated sludge Nitrosomonas Nitrobacter Median inhibition concentration (IC50)
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Jonsson K, Grunditz C, Dalhammar G, et al. Occurrence of nitrification inhibition in Swedish municipal wastewater. Water Research, 2000, 34:2 455-2 462.
  • 2JOnsson K, Jansen J L C, Screening method for evaluation of inhibition of nitrification in Sweden, Water Science and Technology,1999, 40 (2): 175-178.
  • 3Grau P, Da-Rin B P. Management of toxicity effects in a large wastewater treatment plant. Water Science and Technology,1997, 36 (2-3): 1-8.
  • 4Love N G, Bott C B, A review and needs survey of upset early warning devices. Alexandria (VA) : Water Environment Research Foundation, 2000.
  • 5Gutierrez M, Etxebarria J, Fuentes L D L, Evaluation of wastewater toxicity: comparative study between Microtox8 and activated sludge oxygen uptake inhibition. Water Research, 2002, 36:919-924.
  • 6Dalzell D J B, Alte S, Aspichueta E, et al. A comparison of five rapid direct toxicity assessment methods to determine toxicity of pollutants to active sludge. Chemosphere, 2002, 47:535-545.
  • 7Arvin E, Dyreborg S, Menck C, et al. A mini-nitrification test for toxicity screening, MINNTOX. Water Research, 1994, 28 (9):2 029-2 031.
  • 8Grunditz C, Gumaelius L, Dalhammar G. Comparison of inhibition assays using nitrogen removing bacteria: application to industrial wastewater. Water Research, 1998, 32 (10): 2 995-3 000.
  • 9Grunditz C, Dalhammar G. Development of nitrification inhibition assays using pure cultures of nitrosomonas and nitrobacter. Water Research, 2001, 35 (2): 433-440.
  • 10Blum D J W, Speece R E, A database of chemical toxicity to environmental bacteria and its use in interspecies comparisons and correlations, Res. J, War. Pollut. Control Fed., 1991, 63, 198-207.

同被引文献132

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部