克里普克的历史的因果命名理论评析

On Kripk's Historical Causal Naming Theory

克里普克对专名词与摹状词进行了严格的区分,他的命名理论开辟了专名研究的新领域,具有重要意义,但他的命名理论仍存在不完全性,因为这一理论无法说明专名的指称在传递中发生转移等三种情况。在专名问题上,摹状词理论和历史的因果命名理论是相互补充的。

The kripk＇s historical causal naming theory, with the distinction between proper name and descriptive name, opens a new study field of proper name, which has an important significance. On the other hand, it has shortcomings because it fails to explain the three forms of transformation of proper name. On the problem of the proper name, the descriptive theory and the historical causal naming theory are intersupplementary with each other.