期刊文献+

边界网关协议BGP4路由收敛问题研究进展 被引量:1

Research Progress of Convergence Problem of Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP4)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 边界网关协议BGP4是目前Internet最主要的域间路由协议,其路由正确性和稳定性直接关系到Internet能否正常运行.作为一个域间路由协议,BGP协议必须支持策略路由,允许各个自治系统独立的制定他们的路由策略,而且允许这些策略优先于路径尺度.由于各个自治系统制定策略的角度不同,这些路由策略之间可能存在冲突,从而导致BGP协议发散及路由振荡.此外,BGP协议本身也存在一些内在机制的不完善,并可能导致在某些情况下路由不收敛或收敛速度缓慢.随着网络规模越来越大,拓扑越来越复杂,BGP路由收敛问题日趋严重,目前国内外对此展开了大量的研究,并提出了多种分析模型和解决方案.本文首先全面总结了BGP协议面临的主要的收敛问题,主要包括策略冲突和协议机制造成的不收敛问题和收敛缓慢问题,然后全面介绍了针对这些问题的现有的解决方案,分析比较了这些方案的优点和缺点,最后提出了进一步的研究设想. Border Gateway Protocol Version 4 (BGP-4) is the most primary inter-domain routing protocol in the Internet, its stability and correctness has directly impact on the normal process of the Internet. As an inter-domain routing protocol, BGP must support policy-routing, enable autonomous systems to independently define their routing policies , and allow these policies to override distance-based metrics. But because of the different point of view among the autonomous systems, these policies always have collisions, and may cause BGP divergence and route oscillation. Moreover, BGP has its own internal defects, sometimes they lead to route divergence or slow convergence. As the size of the Internet increasing, topology getting more and more complicate, the BGP convergence problem become severe, researchers have made a lot of studies and described many kinds of models and solutions. This paper started from summarizing the BGP convergence problem, mainly including routing divergence and slow convergence problem which caused by policy collisions and BGP internal defects, then introduce existing solutions to these problems at present, and at last discussed their future research possibilities.
出处 《小型微型计算机系统》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第5期818-824,共7页 Journal of Chinese Computer Systems
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划"九七三"计划项目资助(2003CB314801)资助 国家自然科学基金项目(90104002)资助
关键词 BGP 收敛 策略 BGP convergence policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Timothy G, Griffin F, Bruce Shepherd,Gordon Wilfong. The stable paths problem and interdomain routing[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2002, 10(2) :232-43.
  • 2Griffin T G, Wilfong G. On the correctness of IBGP configuration [J].Computer Communication Review, 2002, 32 (4) : 17-29.
  • 3Rekhter Y, Li T. A border gateway protocol 4 (BGP-4)[S].RFC 1771, 1995.
  • 4Craig Labovitz, G. Robert Malan, and Farnam Jahanian. Internet routing instability[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 1998, 6(5) :515-28.
  • 5Anindya Basu, Chih-Hao Luke Ong, April Rasala. Route oscillations in I-BGP with route reflection[J]. Computer Communication Review, 2002, 32(4):235-47.
  • 6Timothy G. Griffin, Gordon Wilfong. Analysis of the MED oscillation problem in bGP[C]. Proceedings 10th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, 2002, 90-9.
  • 7Timothy G. Griffin, Gordon Wilfong. A safe path vector protocol [C]. Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat.No. 00CH37064), 2000(2) :490-9.
  • 8Ramesh Govindan, Cengiz Alaettinoglu, George Eddy, David Kessens, Satish Kumar, Wee-San Lee. An architecture for stable, analyzable internet routing[J]. IEEE Network, 1999, 13(1):29-35.
  • 9Alaettinoglu C, Bates T, Gerich E, Karrenberg D, Meyer D,Terpstra M, Villamizar C. Routing policy specification language (RPSL)[S]. RFC 2280, January 1998.
  • 10“RAToolSet”, http://www.isi. edu/ra/RAToolSet

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部