期刊文献+

产品总体方案评价与优选的证据推理决策 被引量:2

Evidence Reasoning Decision Model for Product Outline Scheme Evaluation and Optimum Selection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 产品总体方案评价与优选决策是产品设计过程中的重要步骤,它是决定总体设计之后进行详细设计的关键环节。考虑产品总体方案评价与选择决策过程中不确定、不完全主观判断的混合多属性决策问题,提出基于证据推理的决策模型;对决策属性中定量属性的证据处理以及不同定性属性不同辨识框下的情况进行了讨论。最后给出了实例。 The evaluation and optimum selection for product outline schemes is a very important step from conceptual design stage to detail design stage. With the consideration of uncertain and incomplete decision information in the decision making process, the decision model based on evidence reasoning is built in which the information of all attributes is integrated based on evidence theory. Then the evidence processing of the quantitative attributes and qualitative attributes with different frames of discernment is discussed. Finally, an example is showed.
出处 《工程图学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第2期32-38,共7页 Journal of Engineering Graphics
基金 西安理工大学博士启动基金资助项目(220410)
关键词 计算机应用 总体方案评价与优选 证据推理 决策属性 computer application outline schemes evaluation and optimum selection evidence reasoning decision attributes
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献11

  • 1柯勒R.机械设计方法学[M].北京:科学出版社,1990..
  • 2Vigain Harutunian, Mats Nordlund, Derrick Tate. Decision making and software tools for product development based on axiomatic design theory [J]. Annals of the CIRP, 1996, 45(1): 135-139.
  • 3Hubka V. Design for quality and design methodology [J]. Journal of Engineering Design, 1992, 3(1 ): 5-15.
  • 4L.P.Sullivan. Quality function deployment [J]. Quality Progress, 1986, 19(6): 39-50.
  • 5周 济,智能设计,1998年
  • 6张跃,模糊数学方法及其应用,1992年
  • 7柯勒R,机械设计方法学,1990年
  • 8范顺成,温正忠.机械设计方案制造成本的模糊估算方法[J].机械设计,1998,15(5):19-21. 被引量:5
  • 9范鹏飞,刘勇.模糊优选法在人才选拔中的应用[J].中国管理科学,1998,6(1):48-53. 被引量:13
  • 10郑寿森,祁新梅,杜晓荣,王治森.产品可装配性设计评价指标体系[J].机械设计,1999,16(3):26-28. 被引量:5

共引文献28

同被引文献17

  • 1王洪,唐晓青.设计质量评估体系模型及其构建方法研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(1):50-53. 被引量:5
  • 2徐玖平,吴魏.多属性决策的理论与方法[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007.
  • 3Xu J, Xu X,Xie S Q. A comprehensive review on recent de- velopments in quality function deployment [ J ]. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 2010, 6 (4) :457 -494.
  • 4Geng X L,Chu X N,Zhang Z F. A new integrated designconcept evaluation approach based on vague sets [ J ]. Expert Systems with Applications ,2010,37 (9) :6629 - 6638.
  • 5William H. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its ap- plications A literature review [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008,186( 1 ) :211 - 228.
  • 6Cathy M, Johan S, Klaas D B, et al. PROMETHEE and AHP:The design of operational synergies in muhicriteria a- nalysis : Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP[ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 153 ( 2 ) : 307 -317.
  • 7Liem T, Lucien D. Comparision of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure [ J ]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2002 (130) :331 -341.
  • 8Xu Z S. An overview of methods for determining OWA weights [ J ]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,2005 (20) :843 - 865.
  • 9Belton N,Gear A E.On a shortcoming of saaty’s method of analysis hierarchies[J].Omega,1983,11(3):143-144.
  • 10Triantaphyllou E.Multi-criteria decision making methods:a comparative study[M].Boston,MA,USA:Kluwer Academic Publishers,2000.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部