阿多诺与总体性的真实关系

On Real Relationship Between Adorno and Totality

关于阿多诺的“否定的辩证法”,有一个由来已久的错误认识,即认为它是反“总体性”的。本文在详尽考察卢卡奇的“总体性”概念,以及《否定的辩证法》中的“同一性”与“非同一性”概念的基础上,指出我们不能就字面含义把阿多诺所批判的“总体性”不加转换地当作卢卡奇《历史与阶级意识》意义上的总体性。总体性在阿多诺的《否定辩证法》的语境里事实上相当于同一性。那种认为阿多诺反“总体性”的观点混淆了总体性与同一性。澄清阿多诺与总体性的真实关系,有助于加深我们对西方马克思主义发展脉络的认识,也是我们理解马克思主义及西方马克思主义的思想本质的重要前提。

As for Adorno＇ s Negative Dialectics, an misunderstanding has lasting for a long time ince,i.e, it is opposite to totality. Totality concept raised by Georg Szegedy on Lukass is illustrated in details in this article. Based on identity and non - identity, we cannot confusethe totality criticized by Adorno and the totality raised by lucacs in History and Class Awarenes. In fout, totality in Adorno＇ s Negative Dialectics is similarto ideritty in context. The idoas considering Adorno＇s opposing to tatality distort the real totality and identity, claritying thecr relationship can help deeper our recognition of western Marxism devlopment,and also a prerequisite for us to understand Marxism thoaghts.