期刊文献+

采用ASIA 2000标准对脊髓损伤患者步行能力的预后评估 被引量:6

Prognosis evaluation of the spinal cord injury patients′ ambulatory capability using ASIA 2000 scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨ASIA2000标准部分项目对脊髓损伤患者步行能力预后评估的作用。方法:对2003年9月至2004年9月中国康复研究中心收治的42例脊髓损伤患者采用ASIA2000标准部分项目进行连续性临床观察。比较患者伤后1个月时的神经功能与伤后1年步行能力,判定该标准部分项目对脊髓损伤步行能力预后评估的作用。结果:残损分级相同的情况下,截瘫患者步行能力恢复好于四肢瘫患者;神经平面基本一致的情况下,伤后1个月时残损分级越高的患者,伤后1年时的步行能力越好;神经平面基本一致的情况下,伤后1个月时下肢运动评分越高的患者,伤后1年时的步行能力越好。结论:神经平面是影响步行能力预后的因素之一,残损分级相同的截瘫患者步行能力恢复好于四肢瘫患者。不论是截瘫患者还是四肢瘫患者,残损分级与步行能力预后有相关关系。下肢运动评分与神经平面相结合可以对脊髓损伤患者步行能力进行预后估计。 Objective:To investigate the ASIA 2000 scale's application in ambulatory prognosis of spinal cord injury patients.Method:Consecutive observation was clone to the 42 patients who were admitted in CRRC from September 2003 to September 2004 using ASIA 2000 scale.Ambulatory capability 1 year after injury was compared with the neurological examination results of the patients 1 month after injury to determine ambulatory prognosis of spinal cord injury patients.Result:Under similar injury degree,paraplegia individuals got better ambulatory capability than tetraplegia ones 1 year after injury.Under similar neurological level, better AIS (ASIA impairment scale) and better lower extremity motor score mean better ambulation capability 1 year after injury.Conclusion:Neurological level is one of the factors influencing ambulatory prognosis of SCI.Under similar injury degree,paraplegia individuals got better ambulation capability than tetraplegia ones.AIS is correlative with the ambulatory prognosis of SCI.Lower extremity motor score,combined with neurological level,can be a factor to predict the ambulatory capability of SCI patients.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 2006年第4期276-279,共4页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 脊髓损伤 ASIA 2000标准 步行能力 预后 Spinal cord injury ASIA2000 scale Ambulation Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Kirshblum S,Millis S,McKinley W,et al.Late neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury [J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2004,85 (11):1811-1817.
  • 2Kirshblum SC,Memmo P,Kim N,et al.Comparison of the revised 2000 American Spinal Injury Association classification standards with the 1996 guidelines [J].Am J Phys Med Rehabil,2002,81 (7):502-505.
  • 3American Spinal Injury Association and International Medical Society of Paraplegia:International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury,Revised 2000[P].Chicago,American Spinal Injury Association,2000.
  • 4Waters RL,Adkins R,Yakura J,et al.Donal Munro Lecture:Functional and neurologic recovery following acute SCI[J].J Spinal Cord Med,1998,21 (3):195-199.
  • 5Marino RJ,Graves DE.Metric properties of the ASIA motor score:subscales improve correlation with functional activities [J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2004,85(11):1804-1810.
  • 6Crozier KS,Cheng LL,Graziani V,et al.Spinal cord injury:prognosis for ambulation based on quadriceps recovery[J].Paraplegia,1992,30 (11):762-767.
  • 7Waters RL,Adkins RH,Yakura JS.et al.Recovery following complete paraplegia [J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,1992,73(9):784-789.
  • 8Waters RL,Adkins RH,Yakura JS.et al.Motor and sensory recovery following complete tetraplegia [J].Arch PhysMed Rehabil,1993,74 (3):242-247.
  • 9Waters RL,Adkins RH,Yakura JS.et al.Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia [J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,1994,75 (3):306-311.
  • 10Crozier KS,Graziani V,Ditunno JF Jr,et al.Spinal cord injury:prognosis for ambulation based on sensory examination in patients who are initially motor complete [J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,1991,72(2):119-121.

同被引文献74

引证文献6

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部