期刊文献+

“制衡”的困境——均势与二十一世纪的世界政治 被引量:13

Dilemma of Balancing: Balance of Powe r and World Politics in the 21^(st) Century
原文传递
导出
摘要 尽管均势理论在现代国际关系理论体系中一直占有重要地位,但随着冷战结束和苏联瓦解,这一理论却开始面临严峻的挑战,其中最突出的挑战之一来自冷战后开始并持续至今的单极世界格局。均势理论面临这一挑战的原因,就在于以往的理论家们总是将均势及相关各种命题看作一种适用于任何国际体系的普遍真理,但事实上很少有哪种理论是普遍正确的,它们一般都带有各种限制条件,均势理论也不例外。由于均势理论是在近代以来欧洲国家体系的经验基础上形成的,因此这一理论的主要限制条件之一是,它所揭示的那种历史上欧洲各大国对各种霸权觊觎国的制衡倾向,针对的主要是那种以庞大陆军力量为基础的陆上霸权,而不是那种以贸易、金融和海军为基础的海上霸权。这一限制条件对我们正确理解当今世界政治有着极为重要的意义。 The theory of Balance-of-Power h as always had an important position in modern theories of international relation s. However, since the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, it has been confronted with increasingly bigger challenges, among which the mos t serious one is the so-called “unipolar” in contemporary world. Balance of P ower and relevant propositions had been considered universal and applicable to a ny international systems. But the fact is, few theories could be universal, as some scope conditions must be satisfied in order to put a theory into practice. In this respect,Balance of Power is not an exception. And, as the theor y is developed on the power system in modern Europe, its most important scope co ndition is that the tendency of balance illustrated by European great powers in history is against those land-based military powers in the form of large army r ather than those global maritime powers based on trade, finance and navy.
作者 吴征宇
出处 《欧洲研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第2期69-81,共13页 Chinese Journal of European Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1John Ikenberry ed. , America Unrivalled: The Future of the Balance of Power,Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
  • 2Jack Levy, "Balance and Balancing: Concepts, Propositions and Research Design", in John Vasquez & Colin Elman eds. , Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate, Upper Saddle River, N. J. : Prentice Hall, 2002, p. 140.
  • 3John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: W. W.Norton & Company, 2001, "Chapter 4".
  • 4Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society, New York : Columbia University Press, 1995, p. 97.
  • 5Henry Kissinger, Diplomacy, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994, pp. 21 -22.
  • 6Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society, p. 102.
  • 7汉斯·摩根索.《国际纵横策论》.卢明华,等译.上海:上海译文出版社1995年版,第224页.
  • 8Michael W. Doyle, Ways of War and Peace, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. , 1997,"Chapter 5".
  • 9Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1979,p. 119.
  • 10Inis L. Claude Jr. , Power and International Relations, New York: Random House, 1962,p. 47.

二级参考文献40

  • 1[美]亚历山大·温特著 秦亚青译.《国际政治的社会理论》[M].上海人民出版社,2000年.198-229,281-290.
  • 2[美]汉斯·摩根索著 卢明华译.《国际纵横策论》[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1995年版.第3页.
  • 3[美]汉斯·摩根索.《国际纵横策论》[M].,.第36页.
  • 4Martin Wight,"The Balance of Power and International Order"in Allan James,eds.,The Bases of International Order,Oxford:Oxford University Press,1973,p.97.
  • 5David Hume,"Of the Balance of Power",in John Vasques,eds.,Classics of International Relations,Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall,1986,p.282.
  • 6Michael Sheehan,THe Balance of Power,New York:Routledge,1996,p.193.
  • 7Hedley Bull,The Anarchical Society,New York:Columbia University Press,1995,p.97.
  • 8Henry Kissinger,Diplomacy,New York:Simon & Schuster,1994,pp.21-22.
  • 9Thomas Christensen & Jack Snyder,"Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks",International Organization,Vol.44,No.1,1990,pp.137-139.
  • 10Robert Powell,"Anarchy in International Relations Theory",International Organization,Vol.48,No.1,1994,pp.313-344.

共引文献27

同被引文献168

引证文献13

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部