期刊文献+

听力障碍儿童与正常儿童篇章阅读理解对比研究 被引量:1

Comparative Study of Reading Comprehension between Hearing Impairment Children and Normal Children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究听力障碍儿童与正常儿童在篇章阅读理解的差异。方法以3(被试类别)×4(阅读提示策略)混合实验设计比较听力障碍儿童与正常小学4、6年级儿童共36人在4种策略提示阅读下的阅读理解指标。结果阅读成绩上类别主效应显著,P<0.001;阅读提示策略主效应显著,P<0.05;阅读时间、阅读速度上被试类别主效应不显著,阅读提示策略主效应分别为显著、不显著;交互作用均不显著。结论听力障碍儿童和正常儿童阅读在4种阅读提示策略上有相同变化趋势;提纲阅读提示策略有助于听力障碍儿童阅读理解。 Objective To research the difference between hearing impairment children and normal children on discourse reading. Methods 36 participants of Hearing Impairment Children from Grade 6 and No-hearlng Impairment Children from Grade 4 and Grade 6 read four discourses with different hints of reading strategies. Used the GLM-Repeated Factoial analyze three items of reading understanding. Results Data revealed non-significance among subjects, significance within four discourses, and non-significance of the interaction effect. Conclusion There groups appear similar trends on four materials. Hints of guide help the reading of hearing impairment children.
作者 邢丹 董冶
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2006年第3期276-279,共4页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 相同变化趋势 3×4混合实验设计 听力障碍 篇章阅读理解 Similar trend 3 × 4 experiment plan Hearing impairment Discourse reading comprehension
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献53

共引文献125

同被引文献19

  • 1王枫,胡旭君,王永华.听力障碍儿童与正常儿童视觉记忆能力比较研究[J].中国特殊教育,2002(4):32-34. 被引量:14
  • 2刘兆敏,刘昌.不同年龄阶段Stroop效应及反转Stroop效应的特点[J].心理发展与教育,2005,21(4):52-55. 被引量:3
  • 3陈俊,刘海燕,张积家.Stroop效应研究的新进展——理论、范式及影响因素[J].心理科学,2007,30(2):415-418. 被引量:51
  • 4Frank R, Metter E, Alan B, et al. Hearing loss and cognition in the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Neuropsychology, 2011, 25(6) :763 - 770.
  • 5Blamey PJ, Sarant JZ, Paatsch LE. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2001.44(22) :264 - 285.
  • 6Jerger S, Elizondo R, Dinh T, et al. Linguistic influences on the auditory processing of speech by children with normal hearing or hearing impairment. Ear and Hearing, 1994,15(2) : 138 - 160.
  • 7Jerger S, Martin R, Pearson DA, et al. Childhood hearing impairment auditory and linguistic interactions during multidimensional speech processing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1995, 38(4) :930 - 948.
  • 8Morgan A . L. R, Brandt J.F. An auditory stroop effect for pitch, loudness and time. Brain and language, 1989, 36:592 - 603.
  • 9Launa C, Todd A. Item-specific congruency effects in nonverbal auditory Stroop. Psychological Research, 2007, 71:568 - 575.
  • 10Sterne A, Goswami U. Phonological awareness of syllables, rhymes, and phonemes in deaf children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2000,41 (5) : 609 - 625.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部