摘要
Shen Shangzeng, a Shang hai writer, declared that he had found that old annotation of “Laozi”, “Zhuangzi” and “Lunyu” was remarkably wrong, while his own works could completely overthrow it, bringing out the original meaning. His works were celebrated by the media to be custom-shocking, and a masterpiece bold to challenge the two-thousand-year authority of annotation. Thus, he was acclaimed as a challenger in the shrine of scholarship. By differentiating and analyzing his relevant annotation, this paper disproves his “contribution”, indicating that his so-called “overthrowing” is full of arbitrary misinterpretations, garbling and totally misrepresenting the meaning of original works. In our opinion, since Mr. Shen broadens his influence in the banner of academics, his action can not be taken as jape of literator. We must judge it in terms of academic criteria, not starting from prejudices, but from responsibility.
Shen Shangzeng, a Shang hai writer, declared that he had found that old annotation of “Laozi”, “Zhuangzi” and “Lunyu” was remarkably wrong, while his own works could completely overthrow it, bringing out the original meaning. His works were celebrated by the media to be custom-shocking, and a masterpiece bold to challenge the two-thousand-year authority of annotation. Thus, he was acclaimed as a challenger in the shrine of scholarship. By differentiating and analyzing his relevant annotation, this paper disproves his “contribution”, indicating that his so-called “overthrowing” is full of arbitrary misinterpretations, garbling and totally misrepresenting the meaning of original works. In our opinion, since Mr. Shen broadens his influence in the banner of academics, his action can not be taken as jape of literator. We must judge it in terms of academic criteria, not starting from prejudices, but from responsibility.
出处
《哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第4期40-45,共6页
Philosophical Research
