期刊文献+

腹腔镜治疗直肠癌术后复发的初步经验 被引量:7

Experience of laparoscopic salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨直肠癌根治术后复发腹腔镜再手术的可行性。方法2004年2月至2005年7月间直肠癌术后复发腹腔镜再手术病例7例,其中男4例,女3例,中位年龄60(37~74)岁。术前CT等评估直肠癌复发为局部复发,排除远处转移。其中3例为传统Dixon术后,2例腹腔镜Dixon术后,1例腹腔镜Parks术后,1例3次经骶局部切除并有骶部瘘;手术采用腹腔镜辅助和腹腔镜手辅助技术。结果再手术中6例为中央型,手术均为R0,分别为腹腔镜Dixon术3例,腹会阴联合切除1例,后盆腔清扫1例,结肠全切末端回肠造口1例(家族性息肉病)。1例复合型,行腹腔镜乙结肠造口。腹腔镜手辅助2例。手术时间(211±13)min,出血量(200±91)ml,无中转开腹,无吻合口漏等并发症发生,住院时间(15±10)d。结论直肠癌复发再手术困难,操作者应具有丰富的腹腔镜技术和直肠手术经验,并选择中央型等适当病例的条件下可行。 Objective To investigate the feasibility of the laparoscopic salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Methods Seven cases with recurrent rectal carcinoma treated by laparoscopic salvage surgery from February 2004 to July 2005 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, four were males and 3 females, and the median age was 60 years ( range 37-74). Three cases of recurrence were after conventional anterior resection, 2 after laparoscopic-assist anterior resection, 1 after laparoscopic-assist Parks' procedure, and 1 with pars sacralis fistula after persacro-local resection for three times. Image examination (CT scanning) was taken preoperatively to evaluate the locally recurrence and exclude the distant metastases. The laparoscopic-assist procedure with or without a hand-assist technique was used in this study. Results Six cases with the recurrent lesion of central type were treated by salvage surgical procedure as follows: 3 laparoscopic-assist anterior resection, 1 laparuscopic-assist abdominoperineal resection, 1 laparoscopic-assist posterior exenteration, and 1 laparoscopic-assist proctocolectomy with a terminal ileum stoma. All of them were R0 resection confirmed by postoperative pathological examination. The other one with the lesion of combination type was treated with the procedure of laparoscopic-assist sigmoid colostomy. A hand-assist technique was used in 2 cases. The mean operation time, bleeding and hospital day was (211 ± 13 ) min, (200 ± 91 ) ml, and ( 15 ± 10) d, respectively. No conversion and complication occurred. Conclusion Laparoscopic salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer is safe and feasible when taken by experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeon to the cases with the recurrent lesion of central type.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第9期597-599,共3页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 直肠肿瘤 复发 腹腔镜 Rectal neoplasms Recurrence Laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc ,2003,17:636-640.
  • 2Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial, Lancet,2004, 363 : 1187-1192.
  • 3Garcia-Aguilar J, Cromwell JW, Marra C,et al. Treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum, 2001,44:1743-1748.
  • 4Abulafi AM, Williams NS. Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: the problem, mechanisms, management and adjuvant therapy. Br J Surg, 1994,81:7-19.
  • 5Lopez-Kostner F, Fazio VW, Vignali A, et al. Locally recurrent rectal cancer: predictors and success of salvage surgery. Dis Colon Rectum,2001,44: 173-178.
  • 6Papachristodoulou A, Kouskos E, Markopoulos C, et al.Local recurrenceafter radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Int Surg, 2002, 87 : 19-24.
  • 7Shoup M, Guillem JG, Alektiar KM, et al. Predictors of survival in recurrent rectal cancer after resection and intraoperative radiotherapy.Dis Colon Rectum,2002,45:585-592.

同被引文献102

  • 1池畔,林惠铭,陈燕昌,徐宗斌.手助腹腔镜扩大右半结肠切除血管骨骼化淋巴清扫术[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(5):410-412. 被引量:17
  • 2宗雅萍,冯波,陆爱国,马君俊,李健文,王明亮,胡伟国,董峰,臧潞,毛志海,郑民华.腹腔镜直肠全系膜切除治疗中低位直肠癌的前瞻性非随机对照研究[J].外科理论与实践,2006,11(5):393-396. 被引量:30
  • 3腹腔镜结肠直肠癌根治手术操作指南(2006版)[J].外科理论与实践,2006,11(5):462-464. 被引量:271
  • 4葛鹏 王存川 陈鋆 胡友主 许朋 苏超 杨景哥.伴有肠梗阻的结直肠癌腹腔镜辅助手术[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2007,10(1):81-82. 被引量:3
  • 5The MRC CLASICC trial group.Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopicassisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. (MRC CLASICC trial):multicentre,randomised controlled trial [ J ].Lancet, 2005, 365(9472): 1718-1726.
  • 6Frasson M, Braga M, Vignali A, et al. Benefits of laparoscnpic colnrectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008,51 (3):296-300.
  • 7The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004,350(20):2050-2059.
  • 8Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial [J]. Ann Surg,2007, 246(4): 655-664.
  • 9Kang JC, Jao SW, Chung MH, et al. The learning curve for handassisted laparoscopic colectomy: a single surgeon's experience [ J ].Surg Endose, 2007,21 (2): 234-237.
  • 10Chen W, Sailhamer E, Berger DL, et al. Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2007,21 (2): 238-243.

引证文献7

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部