1[1]World Health Organization.Laboratory manual of the WHO for the examination of human semen and spermcervical mucus interaction[J].Ann Ist Super Sanita,2001,37(1):Ⅰ-Ⅻ,1-123.
3[4]Suzuki T,Shibahara H,Tsunoda H,et al.Comparison of the Sperm Quality Analyzer ⅡC variables with the computer-aided sperm analysis estimates[J].Int J Androl,2002,25(1):49-54.
4[5]Fuse H,Akashi T,Nozaki T,et al.Assessment of sperm quality analyzer Ⅱ B:comparison with manual semen analysis and CASA[J].Arch Androl,2005,51(1):65-67.
1Gopalkrishnan K, Padwal V, Balaiah D. Efficiency of routine semen analysis to predict functional and structural integrity of human spermatozoa. Indian J Exp Biol 1995; 33(9): 652-654
2Johnston RC, Kovacs GT, Lording DH, et al. Correlation of semen variables and pregnancy rates for donor insemination: a 15-year retrospective. Fertil Steril 1994;61(2): 355-359
3Johnson JE, Boone WR, Blackhurst DW. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part I. Comparison of counting chambers. Fertil Ste ril 1996; 65 ( 1):150-155
5Garmer D L, Johnson L A. Viability assessment of mammalian sperm using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide[J]. Biol Reprod, 1995,53(2 ) : 276-284.
6刘国世.狐精子生物学研究[D].东北林业大学博士论文,1999.
7Garner D L, Thomas C Fluorometric assessments of A, Joerg H W, et al. mitochondrial function and viability in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa[J] Biol Reprod, 1997,57( 6 ) : 1401-1 406.
