1Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-typo femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1979,141 : 17-27.
2Gibbons CER, Davies AJ, Amis AA, et al. Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes with femoral components of differing design philosophy. Int Orthop,2001,25:89-92.
3Young-Hoo Kim. Titanium and Cobalt-Chrome Cementless Femoral Stems of Identical Shape Produce Equal Results. Clinical Orthopaedics& Related Research, 2004,427 : 148-156.
4Engh CA, Bobyn JD. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hiparthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988,231:7-28.
5Reiter A, Gellrieh JC, Baehmann J, et al. Changes of periprosthetic bone mineral density in cementless bicontact stem implantation;influence of different parameters-a prospective 4-year fallow-up. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb,2003,141 : 283-288.
6Kilgus DJ, Shimaoka EE, Tipton JS, et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral density around porouscoated cementless femoral implants. Methods and preliminary results. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1993,75 : 279-287.
7McAuley JP, Syehterz C J, Engh, CA. Influence of porous coating level on proximal femoral remodeling. A postmortem analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2000,371 : 146-153.
8Engh CA Jr, Young AM, Engh CA Sr, et al. Clinical consequences of stress shielding after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003,417 : 157-163.
9Rosenthall L, Bobyns D J, Tanzer M. Periprosthetic bone deneitometry of the hip: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional bone remodelling. International Orthopaedics, 1999,23 : 325-329.
10Bodcn H, Adolphson P, Oberg M, Unstable versus stable uncemented femoral stems : a radiological study of periprosthetic bone changes in two types of uncemented stems with different concepts of fixation.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2004,124 : 382-392.
