期刊文献+

鳗弧菌和溶藻弧菌二联疫苗对大菱鲆的免疫效果 被引量:17

Immune efficacy of a bivalent vaccine for turbot against Vibrio anguillarum and V.alginolyticus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将鳗弧菌(Vibrio anguillarum)和溶藻弧菌(V.alginolyticus)分别用0.3%福尔马林灭活,制备成鳗弧菌和溶藻弧菌2种单苗,并将2种菌等量配制成二联疫苗,单次腹腔注射免疫大菱鲆(Scophtalmus maximus)。通过检测免疫后替代途径补体活力、溶菌酶活力、抗体凝集效价的变化并分别进行攻毒实验比较疫苗的免疫效果。结果显示,3种疫苗对所测定的各免疫指标都有一定的促进作用,但二联疫苗后期效果低于2种单苗。二联疫苗对鳗弧菌和溶藻弧菌的免疫保护率分别为83.52%和83.24%,而鳗弧菌单苗对鳗弧菌攻毒、溶藻弧菌单苗对溶藻弧菌攻毒的免疫保护率分别为80.37%和74.89%。可以认为2株菌具有制备二联疫苗的可能性。 The most commonly encountered Vibrio species of pathogen in fish is Vibrio anguillarum, which is responsible for the majority of losses worldwide. V. alginolyticus also is common pathogen. The main objective of this work was to design a bivalent vaccine against these two bacteria and to study its effectiveness. The V. anguillarum vaccine, V. alginolyticus vaccine anda bivalent vaccine were prepared against these two pathogens from 0.3 % formalin-killed cells without any adjuvant. The final concentrated bivalent vaccine that was produced using equal volumes of each monovalent vaccine were at 2×10^9 CFU/ mL. Turbots ( Scophtalmus maximus), body weight (31.2±1.9) g, were divided into four groups, each with 30 or 60 individuals. The fish were immunized with the vaccines by single i.p. injection in a volume of 0.2 mL. Control group received 0.2 mL of PBS. The fish were starved for 2 days prior to vaccination. The efficacy of vaccines was evaluated by the measurement of alternative complement activity (ACH50), lysozyme activity, antibody titer and challenge of the two bacteria respectively. Plasma were collected per week from 15 turbots in each group and stored at - 20℃. ACH50 and lysozyme activity were measured following Yano and Ellis. Antibody titer was determined by use of a microtitration agglutination test. At last the fish were challenged by i.p. injection of the bacterial suspension and monitored for 14 days. Mortalities were recorded daily. To evaluate the significance of the difference between vaccined and unvaccined turbots, statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (11.0). The results indicated that the three vaccines enhanced the tested non-specific and specific immune functions. But the lysozyme activity and antibody titer of bivalent vaccine were lower than two monovalent vaccines in the last 2 - 3 weeks. ACH50 of bivalent vaccine became lower and lower from the beginning of experiment. In this work, the three immune parameters might be affected by two antigens administered contemporary. It might be the evidence of antigenic competition. The bivalent vaccine induced protection rates of 83.52 % and 83.24 % against V. anguillarum and V. alginolyticus respectively. The protection rates of V. anguillarum vaccine against Vibrio anguillarum and V. alginolyticus vaccine against V. alginolyticus were 80.37 % and 74.89%. Immunological cross-reaction may be the possible mechanism between V. anguillarum and V. alginolyticus. In conclusion, this new bivalent vaccine is effective in protecting turbots against V. anguillarum and V. alginolyticus. It is possible to design a bivalent vaccine.
出处 《中国水产科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第3期397-402,共6页 Journal of Fishery Sciences of China
基金 科技部社会公益研究专项(2004DIB4J165) 山东省科技发展计划项目(2003-4-1)
关键词 大菱鲆 二联疫苗 鳗弧菌 溶藻弧菌 Scophtalmus maximus bivalent vaccine Vibrio anguillarum Vibrio alginolyticus
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Egidius E.Vibriosis:Pathogenicity and pathology,A review[J].Aquaculture,1987,67:15-28.
  • 2Brichnell I R,Bowden T J,Verner-Jeffreys D W,et al.Susceptibility of juvenile and sub-adult Atlantic halibut(Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.) to infection by Vibrio anguillarum and efficacy of protection induced by vaccination[J].Fish Shellfish Immunol,2000,10(4):319-327.
  • 3姚志刚,丁天宝.大菱鲆育苗期的细菌病研究[J].海洋科学,2004,28(9):10-12. 被引量:11
  • 4Yano T.Assays of hemolytic complement activity[A].In:J S Stolen,T C Fletcher,D P Anderson,S L Kaattari and A F Rowley (Eds).In Techniques in Fish Immunol[C].New Jersey:Fair Haven.SOS Publications,1992.131-141.
  • 5Ellis A E.Lysozyme assays[A].Techniques in Fish Immunol[C].New Jersey:Fair Haven.SOS Publications,1990.101 -103.
  • 6Klesius P H,Shoemaker C A,Evans J J.Efficacy of single and combined Streptococcus iniae isolate vaccine administered by intraperitoneal and intramuscular routes in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)[J].Aquaculture,2000,188:237-246.
  • 7Anderson D P.Immunostimulants,adjuvants and vaccine carrier in fish:application to aquaculture[J].Annual Review of Fish Dis,1992,2:281-307.
  • 8Yano T,Hatayama T,Matsuyama H,et al.Titration of the alternative complement pathway activity of representative cultured fishes[J].Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi,1988,54:1 049-1 054.
  • 9Yano T,Matsuyama H,Mangindaan R E P.Polysaccharideinduced protection of carp,Cyprinus carpio L.,against bacterial infection[J].J Fish Dis,1991,14:577-582.
  • 10Kusuda R,Hamaguchi M.The efficacy of attenuated live bacterin of Pasteurella piscicida against pseudotuberculosis in yellowtail[J].Bull Eur Ass Fish Pathol,1988,8:51-53.

二级参考文献19

共引文献45

同被引文献284

引证文献17

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部