摘要
对现行《农用地分等规程》中因素法和样地法进行探讨,寻求农用地分等的最佳方法。文献资料法、比较分析法。《规程》中因素法分等使得研究区单元分值出现拐点,划分等别部分与实际不符;样地法分等结果则不存在这一问题。在农用地分等中, 在县域内种植制度为一年两熟和一年一熟的地区采用样地法分等更合理。
The factor method and the standard kind ground method recommended in the ＂Regulation for Classification of Agricultural Land＂ were compared in a ease study of Chongqing＇s Fengdu county. Inflexions occurred in the unit scores of the region studied, resulting in disparity between the classification and the reality. In contrast, the standard kind ground method did not show that defect and is, therefore, recommended for use in regions where a single crop is grown or a double cropping system in a year is practiced.
出处
《西南农业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2006年第1期8-11,共4页
Journal of Southwest Agricultural University:Social Science Edition
关键词
土地管理
农用地分等
样地法
因素法
land management
agricultural land classification
factor method
standard kind ground method
