期刊文献+

陕北地区非再生能源资源开发的环境破坏损失价值评估 被引量:31

Estimating of Environmental Loss Caused by Developing Non-Renewable Energy Resources in North Shaanxi Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Nonrenewable energy resource exploitation produces a great deal of environment pollution and ecological degradation in northern Shaanxi area.The objective of this paper is to investigate the resident population’s willing-to-pay(WTP) for the repristination of the environment in this area.The resident’s survey is conducted in this research in order to establish a Tobit model to estimate their WTP.Results show that the resident’s WTP for repristination of the environment is positively related to the individual’s attitude on environment,his education degree and family income.Also we found that the person will give a higher WTP if he is in the coal mining area.The results show that the total annual WTP in Shaanxi area is 276974800 to 578108400 yuan,and the total WTP during repristination term is 5539495000 to 11562170000 yuan. Nonrenewable energy resource exploitation produces a great deal of environment pollution and ecological degradation in northern Shaanxi area. The objective of this paper is to investigate the resident population's willing-to-pay(WTP) for the repristination of the environment in this area. The resident's survey is conducted in this research in order to establish a Tobit model to estimate their WTP. Results show that the resident's WTP for repristination of the environment is positively related to the individual's attitude on environment, his education degree and family income. Also we found that the person wiU give a higher WTP if he is in the coal mining area. The results show that the total annual WTP in Shaanxi area is 276974800 to 578108400 yuan, and the total WTP during repristination term is 5539495000 to 11562170000 yuan.
出处 《统计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第3期61-66,共6页 Statistical Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目资助(项目编号40471054)
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1A. Myrick Freeman III. The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods [M]. Washington,DC: Resources for the Future, c2003.
  • 2Mitchell RC, Carson RT. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method [M] . Washington,DC : Resource for the Future; 1989.
  • 3Walsh RG, Loomis JB, Gillman RA. Valuing option,existence and bequest demands for wilderness [J]. Land Economics, 1984,60: 14-29.
  • 4Choe KA, Whittington D, Lauria DT. The economic benefits of surface water quality improvements in developing countries: a case study of Davao, Philippines [J]. Land Economics, 1996,72:107-126.
  • 5National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation [J]. Federal Register, 1993,58:4602-4614.
  • 6Whittington D. Administering contingent valuation surveys in developing countries [R]. World Development, 1998, 26:21-30.
  • 7Ciriacy-Wantrup SV. Capital returns from soil conservation practices[J]. Journal of Farm Economics, 1947,29: 1181-1196.
  • 8Portney PR. The contingent valuation debate: why economists should care [J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994,8: 3-17.

同被引文献398

引证文献31

二级引证文献395

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部