摘要
通过对具体材料的剖析,可以说明“反训”是一个不妥当的训诂术语,而“正反同词”则是一种客观存在的语言现象,在训诂学研究中必须把“反训”与“正反同词”区分开来。
An analysis of conerete data can explain that "Antonymous Gloss"is an unadvisable exegetical jargon.However, "the vocable with two antithetic implications"is an outwardness linguistic hpenomenon. We must differentiate between "antonymous gloss"and"the vocable with two antithetic implications"in the research of exegesis.
出处
《淮阴工学院学报》
CAS
2006年第2期6-10,共5页
Journal of Huaiyin Institute of Technology
基金
江苏省哲学社会科学研究"十五"规划基金项目(批准号K3-009)
关键词
训诂
反训
正反同词
exegetic
antonymous gloss the vocable with two antithetic implications