摘要
目的:比较诺维苯三种不同静脉给药方式引起药液外渗情况及处理。方法:三种给药方式分别为:PICC置管途径给药、肘部单独静脉途径给药及输液途中给药。结果:PICC置管途径给药无静脉炎及药液外渗;肘部单独静脉途径给药,有两例发生栓塞性静脉炎;一例输液途中给药出现无肉眼外渗。结论:诺维苯静脉给药方式,PICC置管途经给药最安全,其次为肘部单独静脉途径给药,输液途中给药最不安全。
Objective To compare the three intravenous administration approaches of Navelbine and the disposal to the physic liquor exosmosis induced by intravenous administration. Methods Navelbine was administrated through vein with three approaches: applying penipherally inserted central catheter (PICC), elbow single intravenous infusion and intravenous infusion . Results Patients with PICC had no phlebitis and physic liquor exosmosis. Two of the patients infused Navelbine through elbow vein alone had angiitis obliterans. Unnaked eye exosmosis occurred in one of the patients during intravenous infusion. Conclusion In the intravenous administration approaches of Navelbine, PICC is the the most safe approach,then is the elbow single intravenous infusion . And intravenous infusion is unsafe.
出处
《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》
2006年第2期63-63,77,共2页
Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
关键词
诺维苯
静脉给药方式
外渗
处理
Navelbine, intravenous administration approach, exosmosis, disposal