期刊文献+

外国直接投资(FDI)与出口的关联度分析——基于三个转型经济国家的比较研究

A Study on the Inter-linkage Degree Between FDI and Exports——Based on a Comparison of Three Transitional Economies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用线型回归模型研究了中国、印度、巴西的FDI与出口和出口竞争力的关联度,结论是FDI与印度的出口的关联度最强,与巴西的关联度最弱,中国位于中间。这3个国家中出口竞争力与FDI的关联度由强到弱的顺序是印度、中国和巴西。流入印度的FDI与出口和出口竞争力的关系最为密切,主要原因是印度具有较强的消化吸收能力和技术含量高的FDI。在印度投资的FDI具有很高的技术含量而且很大一部分投向信息产业,其产品大都是出口外向型。在巴西大量的FDI是市场寻求性,FDI只是增加了资产,却没有转化为现实的生产力,也没有促进出口贸易的发展。流入中国的FDI有相当一部分是以追求廉价的劳动与资源成本为首要目的,技术的先进性就有水分,有70%的FDI是以设备原材料作为资本投入的,但对核心技术进行保密。所以,这些FDI对提高中国出口产品的附加值和技术含量的帮助不是很大,中国的出口产品依然是以低廉的价格为其主要特征。 The paper explores the interrelation between FDI inflows and exports and exporting competitiveness in China, India and Brazil, concluding that in India the relationship between FDI and exports is the closest, next is in China and the last in Brazil and the interrelation between FDI and exporting competitiveness is strongest in India, strong in China and weak in Brazil. High absorptive ability and high technology FDI explain why there is the strongest interaction between FDI and exports and exporting competitiveness in India where quite a number of FDI flows into information sector and promotes exporting industry. A large proportion of FDI flows into Brazil are of market-orientation and increase assets but are not transformed into productivity, as a result of not pushing exports. In China considerable quantity of FDI inflows are aimed at cheap labor forces and low resources costs so the technological advancement is discounted and in addition 70% of foreign capitals are equipment and raw materials, without releasing core technology. Consequently, FDI doesn't benefit greatly increasing of China's value-added exporting commodities and improving their technology. Hence, China's products are characterized by low prices at the world market.
出处 《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第3期59-64,84,共7页 Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家自然基金项目"我国R&D投入的绩效分析与制度支持研究"(70473073)
关键词 外国直接投资 出口 关联度 贸易 FDI export inter-linkage degree trade
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献26

  • 1熊性美 陈漓高.《中国外向型经济发展战略》[M].中国物价出版社,1991年版..
  • 2Blomstrom, M. Host country benefits of foreign investment, NBER Working Paper Series, No.3615,Mass., US. 1991.
  • 3Brenton, P., Mauro, economic integration and FDI:an empirical analysis of foreign investment in the EU and in the Central and Eastern Europe, Kiel working paper, No.890, 1998.
  • 4Caves,Multinational Enterprises and Economic Analysis, Cambridge University Press, UK, 1996.
  • 5Eden, Multinational response to trade and technology changes: implicational for Canada, foreign investment, technology and economic growth, D. Mcferitage, University of Calgary, London, 1991.
  • 6Forsgren. M, Managing the Internationalization Process, the Swedish case. Routledge , London.1989.
  • 7Graham, On the relationship among foreign direct investment and international trade in the manufacturing sector, empirical results for United States and Japan, Staff Worker Paper, world trade organization,Geneva, 1996.
  • 8Guerreri Trade patterns, FDI, and industrial restructuring of central and eastern Europe, BRIE Working Paper, No.124, 1.
  • 9Lall, Introduction: transactional corporations and economic development, Transnational Corporations and Economic Development, S. Lall and J.H.Dunning, United Nations Library on Transactional Corporations Vol.3, pp.1-30, 1993.
  • 10Narula, R. and Wakelin, K. Technological competitive, trade and foreign investment, structure change and economic dynamics, 9,373-387, 1998.

共引文献187

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部