期刊文献+

民营上市公司的治理机制及治理效应分析 被引量:7

Study on the Corporate Governance and its Effects on Private Listed Companies in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对民营上市公司常用的治理机制及治理效应的分析,我们发现:民营上市公司的各种治理机制无论对净资产收益率还是财务综合绩效,都没有太大的解释力,但对托宾Q值却具有极强的解释能力。即使是就托宾Q值而言,股东会议、独立董事规模、两职设置、高管人员薪酬等内部治理机制也没有发挥显著的作用,内部治理机制中的第一大股东具有特别重要的作用。 By analyzing the corporate governance and its effects on private listed companies in China, it is found that ROE and compound accounting performance explicate less than Tobin'Q, and as for Tobin'Q, the inner mechanisms, such as the conference of stockholders, the size of independent directors, the setting of the general manager and the chairman of the board and the salary of the top managers have no apparent significance, but the biggest stockholder has most important effect.
作者 王满四
出处 《财经论丛(浙江财经学院学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第3期84-89,共6页
关键词 民营上市公司 治理机制 治理效应 管理体制 经营模式 private listed companies corporate governance effects of corporate governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1谢百三,谢曙光.关于中国民营上市公司低绩效问题的深层思考[J].财经科学,2003(1):32-36. 被引量:37
  • 2张俊喜,张华.民营上市公司的经营绩效、市场价值和治理结构[J].世界经济,2004,27(11):3-15. 被引量:69
  • 3上海证券交易研究中心.中国公司治理报告(2003)[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2003.10.
  • 4苏启林,朱文.上市公司家族控制与企业价值[J].经济研究,2003,38(8):36-45. 被引量:404
  • 5Claessens,S.and S.Djankov.Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance in the Czech Republic[J].Journal Comparative Economics,1999,No.27,pp498-513.
  • 6北京色诺芬信息有限公司提供的民营上市公司数据库中所包含的2004年的数据.
  • 7上海证券交易研究中心.中国公司治理报告(2004)[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2004.10.
  • 8Claessens,S,S.Djankov and L.P.H,Lang.The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asia Corporations[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2000,No.58(6),pp81-112.
  • 9Baek,J.S,Kang,J.K.and Park,K.S.Corporate Governance and Firm Value:Evidence from the Korean Financial Crisis[R].AICG Working Paper,2003.

二级参考文献29

  • 1刘慧.由家族上市公司的“一股独大”看民营企业的股权结构[J].政策与管理,2002(1):20-23. 被引量:3
  • 2吴智.民营上市公司成长状态及市场效应[N].证券日报,2002-8-29.
  • 3翁淑育.[D].辅仁大学金融研究所,2000,6月.
  • 4巴泽尔.《产权的经济分析》中译本[M].上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,1999..
  • 5Bai, C E , Liu, Q , Lu, J , Song, F M , and Zhang, J x, 2002, Corporate Governance and Finn Valuations in China, The University of Hong Kong, Working paper, November.
  • 6Bebchuk, L, Kraakman, R, and Triantis, G., 1998, Stock Pyramids, Crass-ownership and Dual Equity: the Creation and Agency Costs of Separating Control from Cash Flow Rights, Harvard Law School Working paper.
  • 7Berghe, L A A V , and Carchon, S , 2002, Corporate Govemance Practices in Flemish Family Businesses, Vleick Leuven Gent Management School Working paper.
  • 8Chami, R, 1999, What' s Different About Family Business? NBER Working paper, October.
  • 9Claessens, S, Djankov, S., and Lang, L H P, 2000, The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations, Journal of Financial Economies, 58: 81-112.
  • 10Cubbin, J, and Leech, D, 1983, The Effect of Shareholding Dispersion on the Degree of Control in Britain Companies: Theory and Measurement, The Economic Journal, 93: 351-369.

共引文献484

同被引文献37

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部