摘要
目的:探讨晚期结直肠癌不同化疗方案临床疗效和经济学效果。方法:92例晚期结直肠癌患者,根据不同治疗方案分为3组。FOLFOX方案:奥沙利铂85 mg·m-2,iv,d1;亚叶酸钙200 mg·m-2,iv,d1~2;氟尿嘧啶400 mg·m-2,iv,d1~2,600 mg·m-2·d-1,44 h持续静脉点滴,d1~2。14 d为一周期。FOLFIRI方案:伊立替康180 mg·m-2,iv,d1;亚叶酸钙200 mg·m-2,iv,d1~2;氟尿嘧啶400 mg·m-2,iv,d1~2,600 mg·m-2·d-1,44 h持续静脉点滴,d1~2。14 d为一周期。XELOX方案:卡培他滨2 000 mg·m-2·d-1,po,d1~14;奥沙利铂130 mg·m-2,iv,d1。21 d为一周期。运用药物经济学成本-效果分析方法,对3组治疗方案进行分析和评价。结果:FOLFOX方案、FOL- FIRI方案、XELOX方案的有效率分别为40.0%,48.6%,11.8%。化疗一个疗程住院费用分别为4 704.60元、11 167.25元、6 387.97元。在FOLFOX方案的基础上,每增加一个单位效果,FOLFIRI方案和XELOX方案所追加的成本分别为751.47元和-59.69元。结论:根据本研究结果表明,FOLFOX方案为晚期结直肠癌化疗的较好方案。
Objective :To assess efficacy and pharmacoeconomics of three chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Methods :92 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were categorized into three groups as per of their therapeutic regimens: FOLFOX scheme-oxaliplation 85 mg· m^- 2, iv, dl ; calcium folinate 200 mg· m^- 2, iv, d1 - 2 ; fluorouraci 400 mg· m^- 2, iv, d1 - 2,600 mg·m^-2 ·d^-1,44 h ,civ,d1 -2, in a 14-day cycle. FOLFIRI scheme-irinotecan 180 mg'm ,iv,d1 ;calcium folinate 200 mg·m^-2,iv,d1 -2;fluorouraci 400 mg·m^-2, iv, d1 -2, 600 mg·m^-2 · d^-1 , 44 h civ, d1 - 2, in a 14-day cycle. XELOX scheme-capecitabine 2000 mg· m^-2·d^-1 , po, d1 - 14 ; oxaliplation 130 mg·m^-2, iv, d1 , in a 21-day cycle. The efficacy and costs of the three regimens were compared by using cost-effectiveness analysis. Results: The efficacy rate of FOLFOX, FOLFIRI and XELOX was 40. 0% , 48.6% and 11.8% , respectively, and the inhospitalization cost per chemotherapeutic cycle was ¥4 704.60, ¥ 11 167.25 and ¥6 387.97, respectively. The superadditive unit cost of FOLFOX followed by FOLFIRI or XELOX scheme reached at ¥751.47 and ¥ (-59.69) , respectively. Conclusion: FOLFOX scheme offered the best option in the chemotherapy of advanced eoloreetal cancer.
出处
《中国新药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第8期649-652,共4页
Chinese Journal of New Drugs
关键词
结直肠癌
化疗方案
成本-效果分析
eoloreetal cancer
chemotherapeutic regimen
cost-effectiveness analysis