期刊文献+

OECD“GLP原则”与中国“GLP规范”的比较 被引量:8

Comparison Study on Principles of Good Laboratory Practice for Non-clinical Studies of Drugs Issued by OECD and SFDA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 OECD“GLP原则”是西方工业国家共同遵循的GLP规范。为便于国内与国外在新药研发方面的合作与交流,将国家食品药品监督管理局(SFDA)最新公布的“GLP规范”同OECD“GLP原则”作一比较。两份GLP规范整体结构和涵盖的内容基本一致,特别在有关实验设施及仪器管理、标准操作规程(SOP)、档案管理等方面几乎完全相同;但在人员职责、试验方案及总结报告审批等方面有些差异。 The "Good Laboratory Practice for Non-clinical Studies of Drugs" issued by SFDA was compared in principles with that of OECD which was generally followed in western industrial countries. Purpose of the comparison is for good cooperation and exchange in new drug research and development between China and other countries. It was concluded that the GLP issued by SFDA and OECD were basically consistent in general structure and topics, and nearly completely the same in the aspect of lab facility and equipment management, SOP and documentation control, but with regard to personal responsibility, tes: ring protocol and approval of final report, some diffrences are existed.
出处 《中国药事》 CAS 2006年第5期259-261,共3页 Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs
关键词 OECD GLP 比较 安全性评价 GLP Comparison Safety Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1汪开敏.中国建立和实施GLP存在问题和差距的思考[J].中国药事,1999,13(6):384-387. 被引量:5
  • 2OECD Chemical Group and Management Committee.OECD Series on Principles of Good Laboratory Practice and Compliance Monitoring [S],1998:12
  • 3UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research & Training in TDR.Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Handbook [R],2001:15
  • 4.药物非临床研究质量管理规范[S].[S].国家食品药品监督管理局,2003-6-8..
  • 5国家食品药品监督管理局.药物非临床研究质量管理规范检查办法(试行)[S].2003

共引文献24

同被引文献55

引证文献8

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部