期刊文献+

保险人针对未如实告知的救济权利的法律分析

原文传递
导出
摘要 我国《保险法》未对保险合同的撤销权和保险合同解除权进行区分。《保险法》第17条规定,投保人未履行如实告知义务时保险人享有保险合同的解除权。该规定导致保险人在被保险人或受益人索赔保险金前只关心收取保险费,在保险事故发生后,保险人千方百计寻求投保人未如实告知的情形以解除保险合同。根据目前《保险法》之规定,被保险人通过保险获得保障的目的处于一种不确定状态。笔者认为,因投保人不如实告知订立的保险合同是意思表示不真实的合同,属于可以撤销的合同,而非可以解除之保险合同。保险人因此只享有保险合同的撤销权,而非保险合同的解除权。根据《合同法》之规定,保险人必需在知道或应当知道撤销事由之日起1年内行使该撤销权。否则,保险人的撤销权消灭,保险合同始终有效。 There is no difference between the right of revoking and terminating an insurance contract in Insurance Law of China. Insurer is entitled to terminate the insurance contract when the insured makes misrepresentations in accordance with clause 17 of the Insurance Law. As a result, insurers care only about acquiring premiums before a claim is made by the insured or by the beneficiary. When the covered events insured occurrs, the insurer will exhaust all means to terminate the insurance contract. According to the Insurance Law, the aim that the insured gets protected through an insurance contract is uncertain. Insurer can only revoke the insurance contract when the insured makes misrepresentations instead of finding clues of misrepresentation in order to terminate the contract. The insurer must revoke the insurance contract within one year after he knows or should know of the misrepresentations according to the Contract Law. Otherwise, the insurer's right of revoking will expire and the insurance contract will remain valid.
作者 管贻升
机构地区 中央财经大学
出处 《保险研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第5期77-79,76,共4页 Insurance Studies
关键词 如实告知 意思表示 撤销权 解除权 truthful representation intention expression right of revoke right of termination
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1王利明,崔建远.合同法新论[M].中国政法大学出版社,1997.
  • 2李玉泉.保险法[M].法律出版社,2004年.
  • 3梁彗星.民法解释学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1995.301.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部