期刊文献+

传统知识的国际保护——TRIPs协议下的视角 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统知识的国际保护是当前国际社会关注的热点。传统知识国际保护具有正当性,运用现有知识产权制度对传统知识进行保护存在困难。在短期内达成国际统一的规则与制度几乎是不可能的情况下,应对传统知识国际保护方面的困惑的初步阶段是建立一个防止非法占有的体系,包括建立传统知识的登记和注册制度、传统知识的维持和保护基金、传统知识数据库以及传统知识的合理使用制度。
作者 张海燕
出处 《求索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第4期98-100,共3页 Seeker
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1李明德.“多哈宣言”与IRIPS协议(下)[J].电子知识产权,2002(11):59-61. 被引量:2
  • 2Lester I. Yano, Protection of the Ethnobiological Knowledge of Indigenous Peoples [ J ] , UCLA Law Review, Dec. 1993.
  • 3Carlos M Correa,传统知识与知识产权:与传统知识保护有关的问题与意见[R].日内瓦Quaker联合国办公室,2001,p9.
  • 4WIPO, Composite study on the protection of traditional knowledge[Z]. WIPO/GRTKF/IC/5/8, Geneva,2003, pp30 - 40.
  • 5孙皓琛.WTO新一轮多边贸易谈判中的知识产权议题[J].知识产权,2002,12(4):44-48. 被引量:4
  • 6马治国,权彦敏.基于TRIPs框架下的传统知识保护问题[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2004,24(3):76-79. 被引量:13
  • 7RA F I 2000 Mexican bean biopiracy ; U S - Mexico legal battle erupts over patented" Enola" Bean. http://www. raft. org/web/docus/pdfs/enola. pdf
  • 8Vandana Shiva, TRIPS, Human Rights and the Pubic Domain[ J] , The Journal of World Rights, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 7, No. 5, September 2004, p. 605 - 606.
  • 9Gonzalo Oviedo, Aim Gonzales and Luisa Maffi. The Importance of and Ways to Conserve and Protect Traditional Ecological Knowledge[R]. Paper presented at the UNCTAD Expert Meeting on System s and National Experiences for Protecting Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices. 30 Oct- 1 Nov 2000.
  • 10《W446-瑞士:TRIPs协议与CBD关系和传统知识与民间文艺保护以及TRIPsTX 71.1条适用评述》.Http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo/ztxx/yczyhctzsbh/zlk/ggty/t20050707_50271.htm.

二级参考文献19

  • 1[1]Stuart Kirsch. Lost worlds: environmental disaster, culture loss and the law[J]. Current Anthropology, 2001,(42):179.
  • 2[2]Graham Dutfield. Trips -related aspects of traditional knowledge[J]. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 2001,Spring.
  • 3[4]Communication from Australia. Council for Trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights[Z]. World Trade Organization: 2001,October.
  • 4Keith E. Maskus, "Intellectual Property Issues For The New Round ", in Jeffrey J. Scott(ed. ), "The WTO After Seattle", Institute for International Economics, 2000, p. 154.
  • 5See F. Roessler, "The Concept of Nullification and Impairment in the Legal System of the World Trade Organization", in E. - U. Petersmann(ed.), International Trade Law and theGATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Systems, Kluwer Law International, 1997, p. 136.
  • 6See S. Cho, "GATT Non- Violation Issues in the WTO Framework: Are they the Achilles' Heel of the Dispute Settlement Prncess?", Harvand International Law Journal, Vol. 39, p. 312.
  • 7See Gail E. Evans, "A Preliminary Excursion into TRIPS and Non - Violation Complaints", The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 3, 200, pp. 873- 887.
  • 8Frederick M. Abbott, "WTO Dispute Settlement and Agreement on Trade- Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights",in E. - U. Petersmann(ed.), International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Systems, Kluwer Law Intemationsl, 1997, p. 434.
  • 9See C. E. Barfield & M. A. G roombridge, "The Economic Case for Copvright Owner Control over Parallel Imports ",The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 1, pp. 903 -939.
  • 10Jayashree Watal, "TRIPS and the 1999 WTO Millennium Round: Some Reflectionon Future Issues related to IPRs in the WTO and the Way Forward for Developing Countries", The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 3, 2000, p. 10.

共引文献16

同被引文献16

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部