期刊文献+

丙泊酚预防硬膜外阻滞上腹部手术牵拉反应的疗效观察 被引量:2

Clinical Observation of Propofol in Preventing Visceral Traction Reaction During Upper Abdominal Operations Under Epidural Blockade
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究异丙酚静脉输注预防硬膜外阻滞下行上腹部手术内脏牵拉反应效果。方法选择硬膜外麻醉下上腹部手术患者70例,随机分为A组(异丙酚组)和B组(芬氟组),每组35例。A组患者在切皮前静注异丙酚1.5 mg/kg,再以4 mg(kg.h)静脉维持;B组在切皮前静注芬太尼1μg/kg,氟哌啶0.05 mg/kg。记录患者术中HR、MAP、SpO2及牵拉反应情况。结果A组内脏牵拉反应及嗜睡发生率明显低于B组(P<0.01)。两组患者用药前后HR和MAP无显著差异。B组SpO2在注药后5 min较麻醉前明显下降(P<0.05)。结论异丙酚能明显预防上腹部手术中内脏牵拉反应。 Objective To investigate the effects in preventing visceral traction reaction with propofol during upper abdominal operations under epidural blockade.Methods 70 upper abdominal surgical patients under epidural blockade were allocated randomly into two greups,propofol group(group A, n = 35) and fontanyl with droperidol greup(greup B, n = 35).In group A propofol 1.5 mg/kg was injected and infused at a rate of 4 mg,/(kg· h), In group B fentanyl 1 μg/kg and dropefidol 0.05 mg/kg were administered before skin incision. HR, MAP, SpO2 and visceral traction reaction were recorded during opertion. Results The aocidenocs of visceral traction reaction and somnolency in group A were significantly less than those in group B ( P 〈 0.01). No statistical differences were found in HR and MAP between two groups. SpO2 decreased significantly at 5 min after fentanyl and dropefidol were administered in group B. Conclusion Visceral traction reaction can be effectively prevented during upper abdominal operations under epidural blockade with propofol.
出处 《黑龙江医学》 2006年第5期357-358,共2页 Heilongjiang Medical Journal
关键词 麻醉学 异丙酚 硬膜外阻滞 内脏牵拉反应 Propafol Epidural blockade Visceral traction reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1徐龙河,张宏,朱建国.异丙酚镇痛作用机理的实验研究[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1999,19(8):494-495. 被引量:42
  • 2Grood D.Comparison of etomidate and propofol for anaesthesia in microlaryngeal surgery[J].Anaesthesia,1987,42:366.
  • 3郭政.异丙酚镇痛作用的研究[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1994,14(3):165-165.

二级参考文献2

  • 1徐龙河 张宏 等.亚睡眠剂量的异丙酚对小鼠痛阈的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1998,18:753-755.
  • 2徐龙河,中华麻醉学杂志,1998年,18卷,753页

共引文献144

同被引文献8

  • 1文学锦.硬膜外麻醉下腹腔内手术牵拉反应临床观察[J].中国医师杂志,2004,6(7):998-999. 被引量:5
  • 2杨东林,何小京,吕志平.小儿丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉的体会[J].中国现代医学杂志,2005,15(17):2713-2713. 被引量:27
  • 3Servin FS. Remifentanil: an update[J].Curr Opin Anaesthesiol.2003 ,16(4) :367 - 372.
  • 4Elvan E, Gulden U, llkben G, et al. Propofol - not thiopental or etomidate - with remifentanil provides adequate intubating conditions in the absence of neuromuscular blockade [ J ]. Can J Anesth, 2003, 50 (2) : 108 - 115.
  • 5Erhan E, Ugur G, Alper I, et al.. Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants: remifenlanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol[ J ]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2003,20( 1 ) : 37 - 43.
  • 6Samar T, Sahar S- S, Mahmoud A, et al. Propofol is superior to thiopental for intubafion without muscle relaxants[J]. Can J Anesth,2005,52 (3) :249 - 253.
  • 7Trabold F, Casetta M, Duranteau J, et al. Propofol and remifentanil for intubation without muscle relaxant: the effect of the order of injectio[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Stand, 2004,48(1): 35-39.
  • 8沈徐,袁孝忠,罗永香,孙建良.小剂量瑞芬太尼恒速输注预防硬膜外阻滞麻醉结肠手术牵拉反应[J].中国现代医生,2012,50(30):104-105. 被引量:2

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部