摘要
费耶阿本德认为,民主判定高于专家的意见,因为“科学的优势威胁了民主”,还因为从事科学研究的专家既有限,也无知。民主让多数公民参与,有助于克服少数专家的局限性。
Feyerabend argues that democracy determination get ahead of expertise, which is due to scientific superiority threatened democracy, and the experts who engaged in science study have limited knowledge. Democracy enables multitudinous citizen enlisted, which benefit for conquering the limitation of a few experts.
出处
《科学学与科学技术管理》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第5期5-8,共4页
Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
