摘要
王一川将“感兴修辞”视为文学的主导属性,从而否定了文学的审美本质。但“感兴”作为创作论的局部范畴无法涵盖整个文学活动,同时以“语效组合”的修辞来概括文学也不够准确,“感兴修辞”作为文学的主导属性是不成立的。我们应当坚持文学的审美本质。
Wangyichuan proclaims that "Ganxing Rhetoric" is the primary property of the literature, so he denies the aesthetic essence of the literature. As a part of creative activity,however,"Ganxing" can not cover the whole process of literature activity,at the same time,it's inaccurate to summarize the literature with the rhetoric of "language effect combination". Therefore, the argument that "Ganxing Rhetoric" is the leading property of the literature is not defended,and we should stick to the aesthetic essence of the literature.
出处
《河北科技大学学报(社会科学版)》
2006年第1期65-69,91,共6页
Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences