我国物权立法应否定准占有制度

On Abandonment of Quasi-possession

准占有制度自罗马法肇始,在近现代法上蹒跚前行。其基本功能在于借助占有的规定来扩大和强化对权利事实行使者的保护。然而在现代法上,这种需要借助占有的力量来保护权利事实行使者的要求已经不复存在。现代法律对权利的保护手段已经较为完善,准占有制度不仅意义衰微,还会带来混乱。而且,准占有只是承认非权利人事实行使权利的情形,占有规定事实上并不能适用于准占有,因此其在理论逻辑上也有明显缺陷,我国物权立法理应予以否定。

Originating from Roman law, quasi-possession＇s evolution has undergone much hardship in modem laws. Its fundamental role is to provide more extensive protection to the de facto enjoyer of rights by means of possession rules, which, however, has lost its significance in modem law. FUrther, it results in confusion. Since quasi-occupation laws can only be applied where a non-owner exercises rights de facto, rules of occupation cannot apply to cases of quasi-occupation. Thus, quasi-occupation is theoretically defective. Accordingly, China＇s real right law should deny quasi-occupation.