摘要
目的探索治疗中、重度宫颈糜烂疗效好、疗程短、副反应轻的方法。方法将200例中、重度宫颈糜烂患者随机分为两组,分别采用湿润烧伤膏配合微波治疗及单纯性微波治疗,观察和比较其疗效、疗程及副反应。结果湿润组烧伤膏配合微波治疗组治疗后4周、8周、12周治愈率和总有效率显著高于单纯性微波治疗组(P<0.01);阴道排液量≥月经量湿润烧伤膏配合微波治疗组明显低于单纯性微波治疗组(P<0.05);脱痂期阴道出血量≥月经量湿润烧伤膏配合微波治疗组显著低于单纯性微波治疗组(P<0.01);脱痂期阴道出血时间≥10天湿润烧伤膏配合微波治疗组显著低于单纯性微波治疗组(P<0.01);湿润烧伤膏配合微波组治疗后无一例局部感染,明显低于单纯性微波治疗组(P<0.05)。结论对于中、重度宫颈糜烂选用湿润烧伤膏配合微波治疗治愈率高、疗程短、副反应轻。
Objective To detect one method with better curative effect, shorter period of treatment and lower side effect for moderate type and severe type of cervical erosion. Methods 200 patients of cervical erosion were distributed at random into two groups, given microwave only or microwave plus Moist Exposed Burn Ointment separately. Curative effect, the length of treatment and side effect of both groups were observed. Results The curative rate 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the treatment and the curative effect of microwave plus MEBO group was higher significantly than microwave group. Less vagina liquid draining and less vagina bleeding in decrnstation period was found in the microwave plus MEBO group and no local infection occurred in this group. The period of vagina bleeding when decrnstation happened was shorter in the microwave plus MEBO group. Conclusion Microwave plus MEBO can improve the curative rate ,cut the period of the treatment, and reduce its side effect for moderate type and severe type of cervical erosion.
出处
《中国现代医药杂志》
2006年第3期43-45,共3页
Modern Medicine Journal of China