期刊文献+

我国贩毒犯罪案件中诱惑侦查的法制化探讨 被引量:1

On the Legalization of Enticement Detection in China's narcotics Crime Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 诱惑侦查可能产生被滥用、损害被告人合法权益及影响司法廉洁性等弊端。面对侦查机关在贩毒犯罪案件中普遍运用诱惑侦查的现实状况,我们不能简单否定诱惑侦查。其法制化应从禁止犯意诱发,明确案件适用范围、适用对象、适用原则,以及批准程序、合法性界限和界刑情节、排除规则等多方面加以规范和完善。 the enticement detection can be abused, damage the legal interest of the accused, and affect juridical cleanness. In light of the wide use of enticement detection, it cannot be negated in a simple manner. It is strongly recommended that measures be taken to normalize and perfect enticement detection in terms of its scope, objects, principles, procedures, limits and others.
作者 马红平
机构地区 甘肃政法学院
出处 《新疆大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2006年第3期39-41,共3页 Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 甘肃政法学院 甘肃省公安厅重点科研资助项目"诱惑侦查的法制规制"(022K-01)。
关键词 贩毒犯罪案件 诱惑侦查 法制化 适用范围 适用原则 批准程序 narcotics crime case enticement detection Legalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献38

  • 1面对有组织犯罪挑战的刑事司法制度[J].中国刑事法杂志,1998(4):80-91. 被引量:11
  • 2尹军.卧底侦查刍议[J].辽宁警专学报,2004,6(4):25-27. 被引量:1
  • 3Jerome H. Skolnick, Justice without trial: law enforement in democratic society 117 (3d ed. 1994).
  • 4Cal. Penal Code 701.5(West 1999).
  • 5Mark Curriden,what's the cost of using paid informener? A.B.A.J. ,June 1991, at 43.
  • 6Mark Curriden, The informant trap: secrete threat to justice, NAT' L L. J., Feb. 20, 1995, at A 1, A28.
  • 7Penelop R. Glover, Re - defining friendship : Emplyment of informants by police, 72 U. Colo. L. Rev. 749 ( summer, 2001 ).
  • 8Commonwealth v. Upton,390 Mass.562,458 N.E.2d 717(1983).
  • 9Carla A. Ellis, Current implications of an informant's veracity : Commwealth v. Rojas, 25 New Eng. L. Rev. 859 ( spring, 1991 ).
  • 10PBS Ordine,Snitch:How informants have become a key part of prosecutiorial strategyin the drug war, Fortline, at http://www. pbs.org/wghb/pages/frontline/shows/snitch(last visited Mar. 1,2001 ).

共引文献39

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部