期刊文献+

双腔支气管导管管端位置对肺隔离和通气效果的影响 被引量:12

Influence of the position of double-lumen endobronchial tube on the efficacy of lung separation and ventilation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观测胸科麻醉用双腔支气管导管(DLT)行肺隔离时变动体位和手术操作引起DLT管端错位而影响肺隔离和通气效果的发生率和影响程度,并探讨有效处理措施。方法选择成年胸科麻醉手术患者688例,静脉诱导后插入MallinckrodtDLT。平卧位用纤维支气管镜(FOB)检查导管管端正确到位,并确认单肺通气获得完善的肺隔离和通气效果。侧卧位后行非术侧单侧肺通气15min时,以及术中发生肺隔离效果不佳或脉搏血氧饱和度<90%时用FOB检查DLT管端位置并予以必要的调整。结果侧卧位后112例患者发生管端错位(16.3%),其中12.8%患者发生低氧血症,3.3%患者出现隔离漏气现象。侧卧位后左DLT管端错位发生率(19.7%)比右DLT(12.2%)高(P<0.01)。侧卧位时曾发生过管端错位的112例中,术中有16例(14.3%)再次发生管端错位,比侧卧位时未发生管端错位而术中出现管端错位的发生率(1.2%)明显高(P<0.01)。结论胸科麻醉用MallinckrodtDLT行肺隔离时,侧卧位过程可以引起16.3%已正确到位的DLT管端发生错位;在FOB直视下调整管端位置后,术中仍有14.3%的几率再次发生管端错位。 Objective To observe the incidence of double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLT) malposifion caused by body position change or surgical manipulation and its impact on the efficacy of lung separation and ventilation. Methods Totally 688 patients undergoing thoracic surgery were enrolled in this study. The patients were intubated with Mallinckrodt DLT following intravenous anesthesia induction. The DLT position was corrected with fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB), and successful lung separation and satisfactory ventilation were ensured during one-lung ventilation in the supine position. Bronchoscopy was performed immediately and the DLT position was corrected 15 minutes after dependent lung ventilation in the lateral position or in case of ineffective lung separation or SpOz declination to below 90%. Results DLT malposition occurred after lateralization in 112 (16.3%) patients, of whom 12.8% developed hypoxemia and 3.3% encountered air leak. The incidence of left-sided DLT malposition after lateralization was higher than that of right-sided DLT malposition (19.7% vs 12.2%, P〈0.01). DLT malposition occurring in 112 patients after lateralization reoccurred in 16 (14.3%) patients during surgery, and the malposition incidence was significantly higher than that of malposition occurring only during surgery (1.2%, P〈0.01). Conclusion Malposition of Mallinckrodt double-lumen tubes for lung separation during thoracic anesthesia occurs in 16.3% patients when shifting to lateral position, may reoccur in 14.3% of the patients despite previous FOB positioning.
出处 《南方医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第5期576-578,共3页 Journal of Southern Medical University
基金 广州市科技局科技攻关项目(2002-Z3-E0191)~~
关键词 双腔支气管导管 肺隔离 侧卧位 通气效果 double-lumen endobronchial tube lung separation lateral position efficacy of ventilation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1欧阳葆怡,温晓晖,梁丽霞.双腔支气管导管型号选择分析[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2001,21(6):366-367. 被引量:67
  • 2黄笑玉,欧阳葆怡.地氟醚麻醉深度对单侧肺通气时肺内分流的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(6):367-370. 被引量:8
  • 3朱香亭,胡小丽,高雨仁,钟允宝,郭俊,柏蕙英.国人气管、支气管、肺段支气管长度、矢径、横径、直径的测量及典型相关和回归分析[J].解剖学报,1989,20(4):342-349. 被引量:13
  • 4Stene R, Rose M, Weinger MB, et al. Bronchial trifurcation at the carina complicating use of a double-lumen tracheal tube [J].Anesthesiology, 1994, 80(5): 1162-4.
  • 5Benumof JL, Partridge BL, Salvatierra C, et al. Margin of safety in positioning modem double-lumen endotracheal tubes [J].Anesthesiology, 1987, 67(5): 729-38.
  • 6Inoue S, Nishimine N, Kitaguchi K, et al. Double lumen tube location predicts tube malposition and hypoxaemia during one lung ventilation[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2004, 92(2): 195-201.
  • 7Desiderio DP, Burt M, Kolker AC, et al. The effects of endobronchial cuff inflation on double-lumen endobronchial tube movement after lateral decubitus positioning[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 1997,11(5): 595-8.
  • 8Hartrey R, Kestin IG. Movement of oral and nasal tracheal tubes as a result of changes in head and neck position [J]. Anaesthesia, 1995,50(8): 682-7.
  • 9Yoon TG, Chang HW, Ryu HG, et al. Use of a neck brace minimizes double-lumen tube displacement during patient positioning [J]. Can J Anaesth, 2005, 52(4): 413-7.

二级参考文献20

  • 1吴汝康,人体测量方法,1984年
  • 2张尧庭,多元统计分析引论,1983年
  • 3刘正津,中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1966年,12卷,144页
  • 4王根本,解剖学报,1965年,8期,397页
  • 5刘芳柽,中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1963年,9卷,109页
  • 6江家元,支气管肺外科解剖学,1959年
  • 7李继素,中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1953年,2期,86页
  • 8Mark JB, Slaughter TF. Cardiovascular monitoring. In:Miller RD. eds. Anesthesia. 6th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2005. 1331.
  • 9Kerr LV, Aken HV, Vandermeersch E,et al. Propofol does not inhibit hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in humans. J Clin Anesth,1989, 1:284-288.
  • 10Reid CW, Slinger PD, Lenis S. A comparison of the effects of propofol-alfentanil versus isoflurane anesthesia on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 1996,10 : 860-863.

共引文献84

同被引文献100

引证文献12

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部